The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

What do people mean when they say Pacquiao can trouble Floyd because he's a southpaw? Floyd has fought at least six southpaws. Reggie Sanders, Judah, Corley, Guerrero, Ortiz, and Mitchell. Yes, granted, none of them are as good as Pacquiao, but the point is, he's had plenty of experience against them. He knows how to deal with them.

 

Because Floyd has shown consistent habits and trouble against average and below average southpaws.

Pacquiao is the best southpaw of this era.

 

He said his focus this fight is going to be getting faster, so he'll probably be staying around the 144-145 range for this fight. I think the smaller Pacquiao has shown to have more power anyways.

 

:rofl yeah because ortiz is one of the best fighters in this decade not!!!!!

 

Or could it be they both declined?? Even if they have declined , both are still the best out there. Best fights available.

 

Floyd vs chino 2 -146
Floyd vs Robert G- 146
Floyd vs Ortiz -146 1/2
Floyd vs chino 1- 146

PAC vs Bradley 2 - 145
PAC vs jmm 4- 147
PAC vs Rios - 145
PAC vs Bradley 1- 147

Simple google search dummy. Keep making your self look stupid its amusing. Notice you are one of the few still trolling?

 

then it is safe to say pac does not struggle with technical boxer either as he dispatched bradley with ease?

 

On the other hand, you could say Ortiz and Guerrero are nowhere near the level of Pacquiao. :deal

 

Well in that case, yes. Mayweather's difficulty against southpaws is a bit overstated. But my point still stands though, Pacquiao is a different level from all the guys Mayweather has faced. Mayweather is a different level from all the guys Pacquiao has faced. So IMO it's still up in the air.

 

yes he is although he sometimes can be lured into brawling, but he is a very polished boxer IMO :good