Tommy Morrison vs Wladimir Klitschko who fought Corrie Sanders 2003. Who wins this fight? Current Wlad prob beats him easily, because of clinching and other illegal tricks. But how about 2003 Wlad?
Morrison has a fair chance versus this prime wlad that got desotryed in seconds by wlad, probably by stoppage. Morrison would probably stop old wlad faster. prime wlad would wreak AIDs ridden wlad, in fact I am surprised Waldo didn't give AIDS Morrison a title shot since it is his custom to feast on weaklings and those suffering from mortal illness.
Wlad had already beaten better fighters than Tommy by this stage, and Morrison wasn't exactly what I'd call a carbon copy of Sanders either. Corrie was a south paw with faster hands than Morrison, to go along with being 6'4".
There really was no "prime" Tommy. There was just Tommy. A sloppy, over-partied, undertrained bomber with stamina and chin issues. The battleplan to his greatest victory, over Foreman, could not have been duplicated against another top heavy of that decade. He won that fight, and barely won it, by being able to outrun a giant old man. Holy, Bowe, Moorer, Lennox... hell, maybe even Botha, would not have allowed that. Against Waldo, he gets chopped down and out.
One Shot.... Just one good shot at Wlads chin by one of the best left hooks ever seen. Tommy was a better boxer than Sanders, He was as fast or faster with his hands..... If Morrison lands any of the shots he landed on Foreman, Wlad goes down. If Wlad ties Morrison up and does not engage for the first few rounds, or stays at range... He stops tommy in 4-5 rds..... In no circumstance is Tommy out of this fight. underdog.. yes. but a live one... very dangerous fight for Wlad at this stage in his development.
bent is retired shot2shyte how in that fight? bent was a former titlist (albeit a minor one) in the way that corrie sanders WASNT, how in that fight? not that I want to defend bent at all, btw.
