[url]http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/FIGHT-PICTURES-1897-1940-BOXING-FILMS-AND-EARLY-CINEMA-ILLUS-HISTORY-/140898052319[/url] 1 Yes-- both Fitz vs Ruhlin films are listed here.
Its a book of fight pictures you stupid c*nt! I posted a picture of their fight two days ago! For your education Fitz and Ruhlin only boxed ONCE ,the other meeting was a wrestling match! What a CRETIN!
According to that list, the second Sullivan-Mitchell bare-knuckle bout in 1888 was filmed. Along with: Sullivan-Corbett Ketchel-Langford Both Fitz-Jeffries Both Fitz-Sharkey Johnson-Fitz Johnson-Johnson :yikes
[url]http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/FIGHT-PICTURES-1897-1940-BOXING-FILMS-AND-EARLY-CINEMA-ILLUS-HISTORY-/140898052319[/url] Fac-simile of the Corbett and Sharkey Fight (film; 1898) Fac Simile of the Great Fight (film; 1897) Douglas Fairbanks fairgrounds fake fight films Arnold Fanck feature-length films Federation of Women's Clubs feminism Fight (film; 1898) Fight and Win (serial; 1924) fight films fight films (1897-1904) fight films (1905-1912) film exchanges Film Index film rights Film Service Association filmography Firpo-Brennan Fight (film; 1923) Luis Firpo Firpo vs. McAuliffe (film; 1923) Sam Fitzpatrick This content is protected Fitzsimmons-Gardner fight (1903) Fitzsimmons-Jeffries fight (1899) Fitzsimmons-Maher fight (1896) Robert P. Fitzsimmons Rose Julian Fitzsimmons This content is protected Fitzsimmons-Sharkey fight (1896) Fitzsimmons-Sharkey fight (1900) Nat Fleischer Florida Athletic Club (Jacksonville) Frank Flournoy Jim Flynn Harrison H. Foster William Foster Fox Film Corp. Fox Movietone Richard K. Fox William Fox John J. Frawley Harry H. Frazee Frederick S. Freed >>>>DOLT, the wrestling match between Fitz and Ruhlin took place in 1901! Both the fight and the re-enactment were listed in 1900. DUH. Please leave, you are an embarrassment to the forum. 1901 Jul 9 Gus Ruhlin New York, NY EX -This was a wrestling match; Ruhlin won; Falls: 2-0
Nope, but it was discussed at length. To set the record straight I told him to pick a ring several times for a reason. Legal battery is permitted there. He never did. Gee I wonder why! I asked to exchange emails, he declined. Hmmmm... Then he goes dark for three months and does not post here. Hecomes back at the strike of midnight and asks to meet at the one place I said no way. The airport. Who wants trouble there these days? To add more comedy when I pressed him why he went dark for three months, he said he had a major surgery. Sure he was ready for ring action after a major surgery It would have been over quicker than Tyson vs Spinks. Our resident Dunning Kruger does not read anything that conflicts with his rooting interests, and does not always admit his mistakes. Nor is he honorable. He knows it, I know it, and most importantly he knows that I know it! He can lie like the rug ( Which he's good at ), it won't change a thing. We'll see if can admit Fitz vs Ruhlin wrestling match was not in 1900.
I have read Sullivan vs Corbett was viewed via Kaleidoscope. Not sure if it is true, but its plausible some still shots photos were put into a film like format. I have also read Johnson vs Johnson was filmed. Jeffries vs Fitz was filmed via re-enactment with actors and can be seen today.
Why would you need a re-enactment if you had the original to sell ? How fuc*ing thick are you? I know all about the wrestling match. I know why it took place instead of a regular boxing match, who proposed it and why. I know what Ruhlin weighed and what occurrence happened in the first round,and what followed as a consequence and who was the referee.. You on the other hand know JACK SH*T I know what colour shorts Fitz wore for their boxing match,I know Corbett came over to Fitz' corner to examine his gloves and Ill bet you this ,the fight film you are describing as the original and true fight does not have that in it ,nor does it have Corbett in Ruhlin's corner acting as his chief second. Prove me wrong and Ill not only give you the $1000 I'll leave this forum forever,and you can tell your lies to your heart's content.. The ***** in your court Rainman!
What they are promoting are pictures from those fights they are being nearly as economical with truth as Mendozy is.
No, Mendoza decided not to inform me when he would be arriving in the UK ,on what flight he would be travelling , what time he would be arriving,or what airport he would be landing at .This despite 2 pms and one public message on this forum the day he was active on it. This can be verified by looking back at our posts. He asked for my email to exchange info on a Joe Choynski fight and I still have the pm on my old PC. That is the only time and the only reason he ever asked for it . Anyone doubting this can trawlback through my posts. It can be verified by anyone sufficiently interested to know who is telling the truth and who is a detestable ,lying ,coward . I did not know he had been in the UK until he was safely back in the US. What you or anyone else makes of it ,if anything at all, matters not ,what matters is I know the truth. And ,when that lying ,racist, bigoted ,coward looks in his shaving mirror so does he. May he rot in hell ,and the sooner the better.