Wow. Well, one of them was able to get a MD loss against Mayweather, and another is an absolute all-time great who handed Pacquiao one of his first losses in a long time. But I can't talk to someone who refuses to listen.
Really? ....REALLY? At what point? Was it the 10 punch combination in the 7th round or the 14 punch combination in the 6th? Pacquiao landed more punches on Bradley (about 50 more) than he did on Marquez, and he was still all over Marquez.
Like the video describes, that's never worked against Pacquiao. Especially clinching... I don't think anyone has ever been successful clinching Pacquiao, let alone using a jab. Coming at Manny with your arms open is usually a bad idea for a guy who likes to throw a lot of punches.
That you need to watch the video. It's not using Algieri as an example. i don't even think it says his name. It's just speaking how Pacquiao is able to close the distance and set traps against opponents with great jabs and reach advantages. I was simply saying how Pacquiao is able to effectively isolate the jabs of opponents, and against a lesser opponent like Algieri, was able to completely take it away. I'm not saying he'll take away Mayweather's, not at all. I'm just saying for him to take an opponent's best punch away completely, it shows a level of experience.
Sad approach to accept ignorance. I at least want to have a general understanding of the fighters' weaknesses and advantages come fight night. It'll make it more interesting.
You didn't actually expect these ********s to give a legitimate rebuttal did you? You are dealing with the dumbest people on ****ing earth.
Mayweather's jab? When has that ever been a worry for his opponents?? LOL he doesn't really jab as much as you like him to because he likes to counter. There are lot of things pac has to be more concerned about than mayweathers jab