A question to Roy Jones Jnr fans about his win over J Toney

What an idiot you are.
Heres another example. G Groves who hadnt even won a European title at the time, was able to capitalise on C Frochs style weakness problems. No he didnt win, but he was able to have success from what he had seen with Froch in other fights before the finish.
Yes Charles got knocked out, I know that and said that to you. What I also said is that he gave Toney a tough fight until the finish.
You said Charles had the same trainer as tiberi and adopted the same game plan. He had good success in that fight which proved my point. You noted he was knocked out, which he was, but that doesnt mean he didnt give Toney a tough fight before the finish revealing a style problem. As said different fighter, different fight. Tiberi didnt got knocked out. Did he! different fighter, different fight. You still too stupid to grasp it? Probably, but hopefully its getting through now.
Are you still so silly that you cant say Charles was a tough fight for Toney?
JC Chavez was given a tough fight by M Taylor but Taylor got knocked out for his troubles so in your mind then, Chavez first fight with Taylor was just an easy victory with no style problem to chavez because Taylor got knocked out atsch
I even posted part of the fight, that I alledgedly havent seen, that agrees with what I have written and not what you had written. You obviously havent watched it for a very very long time or are just getting a bit forgetful. there I made it simple for you :thumbsup

 

Hi Loudon

How are you today on this Saturday morning?
Some posters have answered the question. some ducked it.
With Lordofmay, he struggles to understand where he is going and what he is debating.
I dont have any questions on this thread, just clearing up a debate with Lordofmay.
Would you like me to give you a rough recap on that individual debate?

 

I'm great thanks, I can't wait for the boxing tonight.

If you haven't got any more questions, I'll leave you to it.

Did you see the Ring ratings that I posted? They had Toney at number 3, instead of 2. He was highly regarded when Roy fought him, despite his close fights with Tiberi and Williams etc.


:good

 

Wait until Herol sees this.

 

I don't like seeing that.

But I've watched numerous interviews with him this week, and he's come across okay, even admitting that he has flaws and he made mistakes against Saunders. I've not seen that side to him before, but then he goes and does that. There was no need for that.

Do you think Frampton would beat Quigg?

I've seen a lot of Quigg, but not much of Frampton, so I'm looking forward to seeing him tonight.


:good

 

You didn't answer any of my questions and you didn't watch the fight. Chavez vs Taylor?.... Yep you didn't watch. I guess the point youre missing is that despite being a grueling inside fight Toney constantly got the better of the exchanges, hence wearing his opponent down to the point where he could no longer lean on him in the late rounds forcing him to stand in the middle of the ring with Toney. You haven't watched the fights so why talk about them. And again Williams was obviously a much better opponent than Tiberi, it was expected to be a tough fight. The point is Toney beats Tiberi 9 out of 10 times. Actually he beats him 10 out of 10 times considering he got the win on an off night. Have you watched that fight? Toney is the more effective puncher throughout the fight, like almost all of his fights.

Also Frampton will hand Avalos his first stoppage loss tonight, and hopefully we get to see him in with Santa Cruz or Rigondeaux. Jackal v jackal. I think he's better than Quigg because he has more versatility imo, but it would still be a pretty good fight.

 

by getting destroyed by Froch inside single figure rounds TWICE.

and you start by claiming the other person is an idiot.

 

Talking of idiots and this stalker here, just wont go away :tired

 

There have been a few times that I have felt Eubank Jnr has come across as a bit rude. There was an interview he did after a fight before the saunders fight, and I thought he was a bit rude to the interviewer. Its a shame as his father has always seemed polite.
As for Frampton and Quigg, I would also slightly favour Frampton as I think he would keep a bit of distance to Quigg, which is where I think Frampton is faster and a bit better. Quigg seems to like being in close.
I agree, Quigg is a bit underated and I wouldnt bet against either at this point.
It was amusing when there was all this talk of the real world champ from Frampton to Quigg. I understand Frampton beat a champ, but when broken down, Frampton won his world title from a fighter beaten twice by a fighter that Quigg stopped impressively (Munroe).