Brook willing to give Khan majority split so he can take him out

jihadi shenaginigs from khan

 

To be fair to Brook, he is right.

Khan in the past has said if Kell wins a world title then he'll take the fight... back up your words with actions Amir.

 

He knows he loses and if he loses to brook hes done

 

Hope this fight happens this year

 

We've got Mayweather v Pacquiao..

Brook v Khan
Frampton v Quigg

If we get the above two as well this year, I'll be f*cking made up !!

 

I'd like eddie to actually he's offered a fight to khan for say £5mil or 60/40 in khans favour or whatever and provide proof of it, there's been so much **** talked between both parties about the fight yet so formal offer from what I can see has actually been made by either side.

 

Hearn is the problem with this fight, he is already asking for a ridiculous 50-50 split, which already tells me he's blowing smoke and they aren't serious. Kells fight with Jo Jo Dan is a farce that nobody cares about so to get the spotlight on on Brook they talk about Khan. Story of Brooks career basically has involved the use of Khans name to promote himself. The reality however is that he has fought 30 bums in a 10 year+ career, with one legit win at the top level, which was a horrible close clinch fest of a fight. Although Porter was already found out against Julio Diaz and again last night against a career lightweight until he got the KO due to him injuring his ankle. Khan is reluctant to give Kell an astonishingly huge boost in his pay when all he's been doing is conning the public by calling out Khan since the days he was campaigning at 140 but then going ahead and fighting the likes of Saldivia and Robbles. Hearn only has one motive and that is to rake as much money as possible from Kell and thus asking for unreal 50-50 split demands.

 

I've heard Hearn in countless interviews saying that Kell will dictate terms and we will not take anything less than 50-50. I don't buy what he's saying, hes a rat. Well whats his excuse for fighting utter bums fight after fight for so long now then? Khans fought more punchers and bigger punchers than Brook ever hasatsch

How can somebody who earned 127k vs Porter now deserve and ask for 4million? Its unheard of, highly delusional.

 

Prescott fight was too early for Khan, he was still a novice and learning and his vulnerability was taken advantage of. He wasn't meant to beat Maidana, lots of people thought Maidana was going to KO khan he had a 95% KO ratio before that fight where he was just KOing everything in sight.

The difference is not that at all, Prescott was undefeated with 18 Kos from like 19 fights or something, whilst Brook was fighting guys with 10-20 losses. There is absolute no comparison in terms of opponents, Brook has been feeding on the lowest of the low.

When the fight is not possible due to the turn over time between brooks farce of a fight to June the fight isn't even viable for this summer for one. Secondly if your spouting ridiculous demands such as 50-50 and having the upper hand then why would you even bother going into negotiations with an absolute moron of a promoter? Khan has already seen the true colours of Hearn during the McCloskey fight where he was extremely unprofessional post fight looking like an absolute buffoon. I remember when Hearn said that the fight shouldn't be on primetime ppv as it would only do 5k buys, it actually ended up doing between 75-100k buys.

Lets not presume who Khan is fighting until its announced, I remember people complaining that Lopez name was in the mix yet it was just a made up rumor.

 

Why are you bringing up recent fights, I mean when Khan was fighting undefeated dangerous punchers in prescott, Brook during that same time in his career was fighting terrible terrible opposition. Its only in the last 2 years he's fought semi-decent opponents, even though Senchenko got stopped by Paulie in Ukraine :roflatsch. Hearns said it post Brook-Porter, we are dictating terms, 50-50, Kell said the same. Then afterwards he's said it lots of times in interviews that I've seen.

End of March so basically he has April and May because the fight has to be end of may or 6th june due to ramadan. So he only has 2 months, this includes recovering for Dan if its a tough 12 rounder, then you have to promote the fight within 2 months. What if Brook gets beat up, gets a bad cut or even loses? Then Khans fuc k e d because he only fights 2 times a year anyway, meaning he has to risk it for Brook, a guy who is asking for 50-50 and a guy who has been slagging Khan of even though he was in a different weight division, fighting for a belt that Khan doesn't even like due to the Peterson, judge/referee/Steroid debacle. There are just so many things about this fight that Khan doesn't like, he doesn't need Brook, he is in the minds of Floyd and Pacquiao, so why would he bother with this idiotic promoter and fighter and an awful organisation in IBF?

Khan has stated Brook fight can happen late this year or early next year, so maybe just wait, its not like Khan has ever gone against his word. There is no reason for Khan to duck Brook anyway, he's superior in every sense, Brooks power is somehow compared to the likes of GGG with Brookt a r d s yet he's never KO'd anybody at the top level with one punch or showed power anywhere near that level against anybody decent. He's flat footed, slow, throws basic punches and has nowhere near the experience at top level, Khan would have a field day and I am sure he can take the odd shot without getting hurt.

 

khan fanboy's will come up with any excuse to back amir con and its getting irritating. fact is brook has done everything khan wanted him to do but of course amir won't keep to his word. what i think of this is I like brook but he needs to move on now, i personally don't think Khan deserves a world title shot or any kind of mega fight yet so i would like brook to move on and get bigger fights. Don't get me wrong i would still love brook to knock the hell out of khan, it would be a great spectacle at wembley. But yeah que sera sera I guess.

 

good job you stopped at porter and senchenko, it would be tough after that.Did you see the win loss record of kells oppoents terrible stuff

 

I mentioned it on another thread Khan said he would fight Brook when he beat a big name, he did, he then changed that to he will fight when Brook won a world title, he did, he said he wanted to fight Mayweather but if that didnt happen he would be happy to fight brook, Mayweather never fought him, then it was Pacman, he just keeps moving goalposts. When someone does that this often and turns down by far their biggest ever pay day i feel their scared.

 

No thats clearly not what I meant or said. His debut was against a guy who has the second highest losses of any boxer known. When Khan was fighting Prescott during that same time Brook was fighting bums with 10-20 losses, thats what I meant.

Yes hearns a moron, Khan has a problem with him, he has a problem with the IBF, and he doesn't like Brook slagging him of to get himself popular. So tell me if you were in Khans position would you bother giving Hearn and Brook 4million?

I aint gonna spend my time looking for interviews, do it yourself. They want 50-50 since they beat Porter and it hasn't changed now, its all lies that they are willing to budge, all talk no bite. Hearn not long ago was saying he is in talks with Khans camp, another lie according to Khans camp, there were no talks.

Terrorist really? I wish Khan would blow you up though. Yeah well why did Floyd make Khan sign the contract to fight him then? Or why did Manny invite Khan to London to talk about a fight incase Floyd didn't step up? THis is all well known facts, Khan was the second option for both. He will thus still be their next option for a fight come fall and end of the year.

Lets say its Algieri, he's still 10 times better than Jo Jo dan thats for sure!