Pair off the other top 10 Welterweights into who you'd most like to see face who:

Here is the top 10 Welterweights, according to TBR- [url]http://www.tbrb.org/all-rankings/#147[/url]

1. Mayweather
2. Pacquiao
========
3. Bradley
4. Marquez
5. Khan
6. Brook
7. Thurman
8. Maidana
9. Porter
10. Chaves

If you where to pair off the remaining 8, into 4 fights that you'd like to see, who faces who? :think

 

For me it would be:

Khan vs Bradley
Brook vs Marquez

I think those are two good fights stylistically for the UK boys, and will build toward a bigger fight between them, probably earning the winner a place in the pound for pound list, and making a logical opponent for Mayweather or Pacquiao.

Maidana v Chavez

For a domestic dust-up in Argentina

Leaving Thurman v Porter to round it off.

 

Like Porter was going to do to him? :yep

 

No I don't think Porter is on the same level as Thurman (although I do think he is Maidana)- however Porter was not on the same level as Brook and got schooled.

Porter is too limited in boxing skills to ever beat Brook unless Brook doesn't even bothered turning up in any shape to fight like Carson Jones 1- and then I still wouldn't be surprised if Brook won.

 

First of all, I explained my reason in my post.

Secondly, Brook still beats Thurman (who's mandibular fortitude I am not convinced by) and earns less credit (and less money) than beating Khan or Marquez.

And being that in your revisionist theory Porter is no longer any good, I'm sure Thurman who has maybe similar level win to Porter prior to the Brook fight, we will also hear you claim Thurman was never any good. :-(

 

I think Khan is the harder fight for Brook than Thurman actually, and Marquez would be more dangerous than Thurman down the stretch (being I'm pretty sure Marquez actually makes it to the stretch whereas Thurman will be asleep on the canvas).

I also think if, Thurman is the goods, like some like to claim, that fight can become much bigger. For example I want to see Kovalev v Beterbiev- but there's no need for that to happen yet.

And you won't go back on your word under your current account I'm sure, but will probably alt up and not give him any credit, citing the tactics he used was unfair even though it's tactics often used by your favourite fighters- and Thurman is not in the same league as Errol Spence Jr or someone like that. atsch

 

Like you said Porter was a real danger and would end Brook but as usual you was wrong.

Maybe it would help if you stopped watching boxing through a fun house mirror then you could separate the hype-jobs from the genuine articles and stop calling fights like Porter v Brook robberies.