Roy Jones jnr vs Sergey Kvalev @ 175

Ffs, crawl back under your stone you moronic fool. Are you seriously claiming that during the whole fight Del Valle only hit Jones once?:rofl:rofl

 

You saying Del won more then 1 or 2 rounds? Fofh

 

Who has kovalev fought that had the speed that was very skilled with pop like a prime roy jones??? Can you answer that? lmfao

 

Is that the same Dariusz that lost to Gonzales? Is that the same Gonzales that roy jones easily beat in a shut out? OOOOOOOO!!! That Gonzales lol.

 

Lmfao @ this re**** think in that video that was a prime jones. Did i forgot to mention there are many dumb europeans in this forum?

 

Clowns like you cheapen the boxing careers of fighters that you don't lie. Don't make this about you. It's your pathetic outlook on fighters, their chins and their careers. That's why posters don't respect you. DM didn't fight Roy either clown. In fact DM was beaten by one of those weak guys Jones beat.

Just stfu lol...

 

You clowns are talking more about Roy than the matchup. Your true, sorry ass pathetic agendas are coming out. It shows how weak your boxing knowledge is and how pathetic your opinions really are. You can't be objective. You are really just being faagjective.

 

You wrote.

Del is the same guy easily lost to jones which yes he caught jones down but thats because jones was too ****y into thinking del wouldnt even touch him

That either makes Jones an idiot for thinking it, or you an idiot for believing it, or both.

 

Yep, thats him. The same Gonzales that also beat Glen Johnson. Do you remember HIM? Allow me to remind you, he's the guy that put Roid fvcking Jones to sleep.:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Nonsense.

1. Roid didn't even go up to 175 until almost 97.

2. There is no significant difference between thast style and his style in 2000.

3. He still stood off with his right hand up, swinging his left arm in front of him like a demented chimp. The only difference was he didn't have the reflexes to jump out of the way when Johnson came to him.

As you have told many times previously, Jones's lack of fundamental skills are his problem, just the same as every other fighter who relies solely on reflexes. I think the other thread " Mayweather / Jones, who has the better skills " , or whatever it is titled shows that to be the case.

 

Are you really that fvcking stupid?

Johnson was fighting at a level. At Middleweight he was comfortable with that level. At Light Heavy he obviously wasn't comfortable at a similar level. You can try and claim that these mediocre L / Heavies were way above the level he was comfortable with all you like, but they simply were NOT world beaters in the main by any stretch of the imagination. Yet he still contrived to lose almost as many as he won.

Now, get over your stupid self with your feeble self promotion. You are, and only ever will be one among millions of big mouthed pea brained arrogant scum Muricans. That is why a little old Israeli guy came to your back yard last month and told you that your government, and your country are sh it, and a bunch of wan kers, over the nuclear capabilities of Iran.

And you all just sat there and took it, because you had to due to the Jewish brains, and money that keeps you going.

 

Why do you wan't to be so simple with things? He beat Tarver in an eliminator and lost a title fight against a year 2k Jones, and gave him a very tough fight. That is hardly anything to be sad about. Why only strictly look at the 0-1? I just don't get it.

I have never claimed G. Johnson was a great fighter, only that he was able to compete at the elite level at LHW. More words you are putting into my mouth in desperation of getting exposed as a closed minded individual, incapable of taking in any information presented.

Why would winning 4 fights and losing 4 at the elite level make you an average fighter?:huh I would say it means you can go 50/50 with the best fighters in the world at your weight... Hardly average. Poor Foxy can't comprehend anything other than a stat.

I think it is about the only thing you can play... Women are certainly out of the question, and I don't believe you to be trolling me, I think you really are just a hate filled person with some issues.

Statistically, it was no laughing stock.
Erik Skoglund 21-0-0
Ilunga Makabu 16-1-0
Jaime Velasquez 11-5-2
Bobby Gunn 21-5-1
Junior Ramos 10-6-0
George Groves 15-0-0
Andrzej Fonfara 21-2-0
Lucian Bute 29-0-0
Carl Froch 27-1-0
Allan Green 29-2-0
Tavoris Cloud 20-0-0
Yusaf Mack 28-2-2
Chad Dawson 28-0-0
Daniel Judah 23-3-3
Aaron Norwood 26-10-2
Chad Dawson 25-0-0
Hugo Pineda 39-3-1
Montell Griffin 48-6-0
Clinton Woods 39-3-1
Richard Hall 27-5-0
George Khalid Jones 23-2-1
Antonio Tarver 22-3-0
Roy Jones Jr 49-2-0
Clinton Woods 35-2-1
Clinton Woods 35-2-0
Daniel Judah 17-0-1
Julio Cesar Gonzalez 31-1-0
Derrick Harmon 21-2-0
Thomas Ulrich 20-0-0

compared to his 31-0 MW run pre Hopkins.

Dave Hamilton 8-2-0
Sam Garr 20-0-0
Ralph Monday 7-15-1
Stacy Goodson 5-11-1
Jeff Johnson 17-11-1
David McCluskey 16-50-4
Gerald Reed 14-13-1
Tom Bentley 0-9-0
James Gatlin 11-18-0
Kenneth Parker 0-9-1
Guy Stanford 16-12-1
Danny Mitchell 10-32-2
Bill Bradley 23-14-0
Jerome Hill 1-2-0
Melvin Wynn 15-22-1
Jesus Carlos Velez 1-19-0
John McClendon 6-12-2
Tyrone Dillard 5-4-1
Carlos Betancourt 20-14-1
Edison Martinez 8-13-0
Bill Bradley 23-11-0
Jesus Carlos Velez 1-16-0
Gustavo Gonzalez 5-4-1
Joe Harris 5-10-0
Jesus Carlos Velez 1-14-0
Vincent Godbolt 0-1-0
Ralph Monday 6-6-1
Dwayne Waldon 2-1-0
Anthony Brooks 4-2-1
James Mullins 5-22-1
Jerry Reyes 3-15-1

Roy was weight drained in Tarver I, which he won...
He was in perfect shape in Tarver II which he lost.
I am not sure the shape he was in for Johnson, though I think he fought too quick, but you can't take credit from Johnson, it would be unfair, but I think it is safe to say that Johnson finished off whatever Roy had left, I bring up Roy's age because many great fighters of the past were shot even earlier.. It isn't a scapegoat, and doesn't mean everyone is shot at 35, but I mention it for perspective.

Again, there are no similarities in the punches. They are completely different. On one hand you had people scratching their heads over a much smaller Oscar collapse from what seemed like a light punch, on the other you had people in awe over a smaller Jones folding Virgil up like a lawn chair with what sounded like a gun went off.

I wouldn't grasp the garbage you spit in a million years.

Hill is a naturally larger man than Roy. Stop being so desperate and trying to get away from the point that Roy was a big puncher at LHW. Size really has not much to do with it anyway, and only brought up Jones' and Hill's size difference to put into perspective that Oscar much smaller than Hopkins.

Hill was not even that great of a win for Roy, but it was the fact that Roy stopped him with an insane body shot, and that Virgil said that was the hardest he had been hit. Which was my only point in saying Roy was a big puncher at LHW when he tried.

I have never claimed Roy was untouchable, more desperation, it is getting sickening to me Foxy..Stop lying about me to try and make yourself look better please, and I am in no way flattered by your insults, I have seen many other people spank you in an argument and seen the same thing.. It was just my turn this time I guess.:roll:

 

I've got Fitz's biography.

It's a great read.

:good

 

You took that beating well.

There is not one word of truth or any sense in this whole post.

This folks is what Foxy posts when he as been wned:yep::deal