ROC Nation pushed Ward-Oosthuizen to HBO, May 30th, Oakland. Denied!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by drozzy, Mar 20, 2015.

Page 9 of 10
  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    39,977
    Likes Received:
    3,108
    Yet all the judges scored round 5 to Froch, which was a close round, but you didnt see it close at all, and then you comment about bad judging :lol::patsch
     
    bailey, Mar 23, 2015
    #121
  2. Capt

    Capt Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2013
    Messages:
    4,906
    Likes Received:
    45
    Well the 118-110 judge must of felt bad for Froch, so he gave him the round.:hey
     
    Capt, Mar 23, 2015
    #122
  3. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    39,977
    Likes Received:
    3,108
    Do you think so? He also gave him round 11 along with another judge, so your comment is looking further lost
     
    bailey, Mar 23, 2015
    #123
  4. Capt

    Capt Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2013
    Messages:
    4,906
    Likes Received:
    45
    All proves my point, you don't know what judges see during fights, they can be more wrong than fans like Bailey. This discussion is over.:hi:
     
    Capt, Mar 23, 2015
    #124
  5. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    12,271
    Likes Received:
    29
    Scorecards mean very little nowadays.

    For the other end of the spectrum but still involving Ward, look at Ward-Bika. Ward clearly won, very hard to score it a draw... lots of close rounds. Yet, 2 X 118-110 and one 120-108 card is what we got.

    Ward clearly won the Froch fight, EXTREMELY hard to score it a draw - if not impossible. Still lots of close rounds, but they were close rounds that Ward clearly won on effective punching - Froch hit lots of gloves and air. Yet, we got a 115-113card.

    Ward's a "just win, baby" kind of guy. Every time you'll cherry pick a round here and there to give to the other guy, most of the time it's very easy to counter-argue as to why Ward won the round. Ring generalship, defensive skills, jab and handspeed are out of this fukkin world.

    Scorecards don't even tell half the story.
     
    drozzy, Mar 23, 2015
    #125
  6. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    39,977
    Likes Received:
    3,108
    You havent proved any point. What point do you think you have proved?
    By saying round 5 wasnt close for Ward when all 3 judges scored that round for Froch, didnt prove any point at all :lol::patsch.
    So as it stands 2 out of 3 judges saw a close fight and nobody saw a schooling
     
    bailey, Mar 23, 2015
    #126
  7. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    39,977
    Likes Received:
    3,108
    Ring generalship can be massive. I actually mentioned that Ward looked far more composed than Froch and his ring generalship is greater, which is what I think won it for him in a close fight
     
    bailey, Mar 23, 2015
    #127
  8. Capt

    Capt Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2013
    Messages:
    4,906
    Likes Received:
    45
    Bailey, all you do here is defend fellow brits in Calzaghe, and Froch even when they lost, or if they had an overrated career.
     
    Capt, Mar 23, 2015
    #128
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    39,977
    Likes Received:
    3,108
    How have I defended Froch when I scored a win for Ward against Froch?
    Why are you bringing up Calzaghe? Dont tell me your another who gets insecure when he is mentioned?
     
    bailey, Mar 23, 2015
    #129
Page 9 of 10