Why no rematch clause?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bubba, Mar 25, 2015.


  1. Bubba

    Bubba So, WHO NECKS!? Full Member

    2,409
    320
    Jul 19, 2004
    Why is there no rematch clause in the contract for the biggest fight of all time?

    Who potentially benefits the most from not having a rematch clause??

    I want to know your thoughts and opinions.
     
  2. CONSTAR

    CONSTAR Boxing Addict banned

    5,010
    14
    Mar 1, 2015
    So they can milk the rematch for another 5 years loooooool

    I heard if floyd loses there's a rematch clause but if manny loses no rematch

    Not sure how accurate that is
     
  3. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,749
    1,239
    Dec 19, 2014
    If one of them wins, giving a rematch would be ridiculous legacy-wise for the winner and it will bring far less money for the second fight. If it's a draw it'll be again best to leave it at that, again legacy-wise. A rematch can always be arranged when it's beneficial, forcing it with a clause is not necessary unless it's a champ giving a tune up fight to a journeyman.
     
  4. jbuffett84

    jbuffett84 Active Member Full Member

    1,169
    0
    Nov 24, 2013
    Probably the money. Pacquiao will be in a far superior position to dictate terms if he wins the fight. He wouldn't settle for 60/40 again.
     
  5. retriever

    retriever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,057
    29
    Jan 20, 2006
    In the interview Pacquiao said he does't want rematch clause because he is confident about winning this fight. Manny said if mayweather wants rematch after may 2nd... Pacquiao will be the A-side on the negotiation.
     
  6. acr347

    acr347 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,724
    1
    Jun 19, 2010
    Rafael reported it was so much work just to get it done, and a network exec told rafael they hated dealing with both sides. Still if it's close, a rematch will happen, or if manny wins.
     
  7. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,118
    2,754
    Jul 20, 2004
    Could be because Pacquiao wants to dictate terms for a rematch if he wins the first fight. He accepted all of Mayweather's demands so he might as well force Mayweather to accept his demands if he wants a rematch.
     
  8. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    even before this fight was agreed to, floyd really didn't seem to want to fight pacquiao.

    to get floyd to fight him twice would be impossible and asking too much.
     
  9. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,327
    Aug 27, 2011
    Whoever wins this one. Wins end off.:
     
  10. Tancred

    Tancred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,338
    4
    May 2, 2014
    Floyd expects to take a decision and doesn't want the clause in case its a close fight
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    400,804
    82,523
    Nov 30, 2006
    Let that sink in, nut hugging factions in either camp:

    The neutral third party involved with the negotiations thought both were huge pains in the ass. :yep
     
  12. Godlovkin

    Godlovkin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,656
    3
    Feb 5, 2015
    Floyd was forced to take this fight, remember?

    ofc there wont be a rematch

    getting the 1st match done is already one huge achievement for the boxing world, let's not get greedy here.

    Floyd has been practically dragged kicking and screaming to this fight, he wont go through that again, unless his fear of Pac finally dissapears