Debunking the myth that is Carl Froch

Hes better than Amir Khan.

Will go down greater than Amir Khan.

Will be more fondly remembered than Amir Khan.

Has done much more than Amir Khan.

 

ok

 

Not feeling the OP's take on white supremacy here, but the point about Froch having become hugely over-rated is solid. He was pretty shockingly outclassed and beaten up by Groves in their first fight, and it shouldn't be forgotten that Froch was an absolutely massive favourite going into that one. The rematch was about even too before Froch found the punch of his career.

Credit Sky Sports and their cheer leading pundits for the perception of Froch as some all-time great. He's billed as some kind of Marvin Hagler in the chin stakes, although he's been hurt, staggered and dropped several times in his career without ever having faced a puncher in the mould of a Golovkin, McClellan or Benn. I believe that some are also put off by the fact that Carl and his entire entourage barring Rob McCracken appear to be less than pleasant personalities.

 

I don't want to argue your points because im not going to waste my time over something which is obvious.

Froch>Khan

 

i think you forgot to mention when he beat Kessler in the return or does that not suit your agenda

 

Carl froch is a hall of famer, the Skype w***er isn't

 

Froch comes across as cringe worthy and arrogant wich he is, but you cant knock his record

 

First of all, Pascal has fought at world level at two different weights since so that was a very good win, Taylor was a very good fighter and it was a close fight but the facts are a fight is 12 rounds not 11 and a half so your point is irrelevant. Dirrell another close fight where opinions are mixed, he won the fight and yet again a very good win.
He lost to Kessler, no shame in that, you failed to mention that he avenged the defeat though. AA a mismatch? Really? He is still to this day a world champ and he beat him more handily than anyone else has managed to do, Poor performance against Johnson but never the less he won, Lost to Ward who is, other than Floyd and Pacquiao, the best of this generation. Bute, the most feared man in the division at the time, he ruined him, if he had outpointed him like Ward would have done then he would have still been a very good fighter now, but he ruined him and that was a superb win for Froch.

Groves I, very poor performance, undertrained, but no excuses he got outclassed and he got a lucky stoppage but he was so impressive in turning that fight around, something that no other fighter could do. Groves II, not superb but he didn't do a lot wrong and when he got the chance he cleaned him up. As for Degale, Froch has never ducked anyone in his life so he isn't going to start with Degale! Haha

Take your hatred elsewhere as you clearly have no clue about boxing what so ever! :hi:

 

Any record can be pulled apart really, I think quite a few could sit there and destroy Khan's record but what would be the point?

Like it or not Froch is enjoying a great career, been in some very good fights.

I saw you mentioned Froch and Calzaghe and the way Froch acted well wouldn't you agree Khan is doing the same thing with Mayweather? Calling him out, saying things like he only fought Pacquiao to avoid Khan himself and in every interview can't wait to drop Mayweathers name into the conversation.

I could accept that maybe you don't like Froch or you are not overly impressed with his record but you sound bitter and twisted to me just because last night Froch laid out the truth about Brook Vs Khan and who will b at fault if the fight does not happen.

 

Froch earnt a calzaghe fight Khan hasn't earned a mayweather fight, big big difference

 

By beating who? Robin Reid?

Khan had better wins than Froch - in the sense that you are talking about.