You guys act like he can just knock out Khan. Lets be real, Brook is not a Keith Thurman. 1)Who has he fought that he has knocked out or hurt in the top 10. 2)Besides Porter, who has he fought that is a top 10 fighter? -Lets not forget that Porter got a draw with Diaz. Stop letting your bias take over and realize that Brook is not a dangerous puncher.
He stopped Rfael Jackwieiz when he was ranked number 6 by The Ring. Matthew Hatton has also gone on record saying that Brook punches far harder at 147 than Canelo does at 154- his fights with Hatton and Lovemore N'dou prove that too. Keith Thurman meanwhile, has never KO'd a top 10 fighter.
But who said that Canelo is a knockout artist either? Brook is a solid puncher , but this is not his best attribute, its his speed , but against Khan he will be made to look slow.
would you say canelo would ko khan though? because I certainly would. and if kell brook supposedly hits harder you can bet your ass he would smash kells glass. :good
For me this thread is a reason to start acting he is :bart You don't have to be a KO artist to stop Khan, that's the whole issue. He packs a good punch, and is certainly a good enough boxer to land some big ones on Amir. And by the way, Khan didn't do much better against Diaz as Porter. If they fight I'd say he stops him.
Exactly my point. On top of that Kell's a boxer not a pressure fighter which is another reason I lean towards Khan in that fight.
What ?? he is the complete knockout artist - long limbed wild swinger. He had something like a 90% knockout ratio when he fought Khan. Ok he has been softened up since , but in no way is he anything else.
brook hits harder than Garcia... hahahahahaha styles make fights, but styles don't make chins. khan has no chin. none.