Klitschko has only defended the HW title TWICE....

Maybe. But HAD Sanders won again it surely would have changed history and how Wlad is perceived today.

 

My point is strong. Cause im talking from the judge point of view. Vitali was clearly winning the match, and did i mention all the three judge was americans ?
Some rounds maybe close, but not the match, VItali was winning by huge margin, even if he lose all of the rest rounds, he still going to get the win.
I have some bad shoulder injury and know how hard they are.

 

Eight more punches landed the entire fight. Was getting backed up by a small heavy with no real power. Missed more punches than in any fight before or after. Than QUIT and never rematched even though both were highly ranked for the next 4 years being rated as close as one and two. Scores dont tell the whole story. In this case it doesnt even tell the final outcome. Great fighters look to redeem embarrassing losses. Are you going to tell me this wasnt an embarrassment? Vittles was mocked and ridiculed after this fight. If it werent for his gutsy performance against Lewis he would have been remembered for quitting above anything else. So yes, he should have sought a rematch just as Wlad should have sought one with Sanders. At least Wlad went on to fight the very best in the division while big bro bottom fed for the rest of his career after Lewis.

 

Funny how they want Wlad to rematch Sanders but not the other 20 guys he beat since that fight.

 

Vladimir Klitschko is the best heavyweight in the world today...............he has all the titles except the WBC which was owned by Vitali. Wilder did not beat anyone in the top 50, did not earn a shot at Vitali's title. Good thing Vitali retired, or he would have knocked Stivene out cold.................Vlad will knock Wilder out, can't wait to get that fight, but Wilder does not want to fight Vlad. Wilder got his **** kicked is sparring for the Wach fight......................Vlad had the WBA, WBO, IBF, IBO, Ring Mag., championships and he won them in the ring...................not to mention the gold medal..................

 

Why would he want to rematch them unless it was a close fight? They on the other uand should be chasing a rematch if they are confident. Byrd, Thompson and Peter all looked to avenge their defeats to Wlad. They didnt, but at least they had the ***** to try.

 

Didnt rematch Sanders.

 

You don't know anything about that fight. Sanders refused to give Vlad a rematch and that's a fact. Finally, Vitali beat the **** out of him.........................Klitschko is a good fighters, it breaking some records, so did Vitali................................Vlad can't wait to get Wilder into a ring, but Wilder refuses to fight him, no wonder, Vlad beat his **** from one side of the ring to the other while sparring for the Wach fight. Wilder did not earn a shot at Vitali's title..................

 

It's one of the most conclusive victories in history!

 

He soon after got knocked out by brewster anyways. So say it's him vs Sanders for gbe vacant WBO, he gets knocked out again, as he did anyway, gets talked out of retiring by his big brother, goes life and death with peter and then barely loses a round for the next 10 years, I don't see it can gong at all other than he fails to lose to brewster.

 

The issue for me is he got knocked out again anyways after that loss. So even if he lost again to Sanders it wouldn't really change anything in my opinion, because Sanders himself would soon get knocked out in a comeback fight. The only difference is he only lost to two people rather than 3.

 

A two round blow out is as conclusive as it gets.

 

retiree nobody from the lewis era Sanders already did end it HA!

Wlad needed a leg up from another boxer to get back into the picture, something which is basically illegal but you are condoning it. Why you doing so, talking in a stupid good cop voice doesn't veto stupidity or illegal tactics.

but yeah Wlad certainly did make history that night being the first HW champ to have his reign destroyed by a retiree failure. That was certainly a first you can claim.

 

Plenty of champions have been upset by supposed no marks. Even more so if you are to include mere titlists.

I personally don't consider wlad to have been hw champ when he lost to Sanders but fan boys like you claim he was the champ just so you can add more defences to his resume.

I see right through you klit****.

 

I didn't say just no marks, I said retired no marks, and unavenged is what I ought to have added.

this appears to be a reply to someone else post. Multiquote fail?