Sonny Liston vs. Vitali Klitschko

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Balder, Mar 31, 2015.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,496
    26,027
    Jan 3, 2007
    That's really what it all boils down to. While I'd pick Vitali Klitscko to trouble or perhaps even beat a fair number of good fighters from other periods for both physical and stylistic reasons, the fact remains that his resume is thin. Sam Peter, Kirk Johnson, Corrie Sanders and Tomasz adamek were quite possibly the best fighters he defeated. Of those four, at least three of them were in poor shape and at least two were well past prime. None of them accomplished anything really spectacular. A few were even able to land on him with some regularity. Once again Klitscko might have beaten some of the notables that some of us have in our top 10. But when assigning him a rating, I'm not even sure he belongs in anybody's top 20.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,422
    48,851
    Mar 21, 2007

    It's a very good list. Strictly speaking you should probably add Rid**** Bowe, but this might be a little unfair to Vitali given the way Bowe's prime overlaps with Vitali (hardly at all). You could also argue for Michael Moorer based upon the same logic. Based upon the best ten that were ranked in the years that Vitali was ranked I got:

    Lennox Lewis, Chris Byrd, Wladimir Klitschko, Evander Holyfield, David Tua, John Ruiz, Ruslan Chagaev, Alexander Povetkin, Mike Tyson, Hasim Rahman.

    Whether we use my list or yours, Vitali fought only two of the best ten fighters available to him and he went 0-2.

    0-2. From ten.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,422
    48,851
    Mar 21, 2007
    Inspired by OF's suggestion i've done something similar for Machen. This list comes from exclusively before Machen's breakdown. I got:

    Floyd Patterson, Sonny Liston, Tommy Jackson, Archie Moore, Zora Folley, Ingemar Johansson, Nino Valdes, Harold Johnson*, Muhammad Ali, Doug Jones**

    * wasn't actually ranked during Machen's spell in the rankings but i've included him because he should have been.

    ** the highest ranked contender for this period not included in this selection.

    Against this group Machen went 4-1-5. He fought many more from the best of his era, defeated more, and lost more.

    He would have the same stats if we included his post-nervous breakdown years, because he wasn't ranked for the beating by Frazier.
     
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    Judging on Machen's record vs. the best four punchers he fought, ( Frazier, Liston, Ingo, and Williams - Mendoza

    Yes it is correct. Most here will agree the 3 of the 4 names I listed were the best punchers Machen fought. You're either becoming too stubborn on this topic, or simply need to watch more.

    Come on! Who the heck did DeJohn knock out? Could be ZERO guys in the top ten. Power is tied to class. A quick review of DeJohn's resume will tell you he took many journeyman types the record.

    [url]http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=22833&cat=boxer[/url]


    Based on the fact that he could not beat a chinny Cleveland Williams, I doubt that. Based on the fact that Ingo iced Machen in one round, I doubt that.



    The list of depressed fighters or fighters on drugs is a long one. Machen came back to what? He was never champion, and his record vs the best is a losing one. While he had a nice comeback to return to contender status, I think its a Mr. Fantastic like stretch to call it the greatest of all time.






    I had him in the 90's. There have not been many elite heavies. Very good ones uncommon. So yeah he made the cut.

    There you go again....Vitali if faced with the same opponents he does much better than Machen. Who is to say which era is better?

    You fancy smaller heavies. That's fine. I'm telling you they lose more often than not to larger and bigger punchers. The light heavies today are a good group...and they would get cream if they fought what you view as a bad group of heavies.

    What I do know is Vitali beat bigger men who hit harder, and has a more impressive record vs top ten fighters. In addition Vitali achieved #1 stats. Machen didn't sniff it.
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    Vitali turned pro in Nov 1996, so take Ike off the list. He fought Lewis and Byrd, neither would give him a re-match. Byrd said Vitali was better than Wlad for what's it worth.

    Holyfield was shot as was Tyson when Vitlai had belts. Vitali was scheduled to fight Tyson next if he beat Danny Williams. When Tyson lost, Vitali fought Williams instead.

    Vitali was scheduled to fight Rhaman, but suffered an injury during training. Vitali wanted to fight with a bad knee, but was talked out of doing it by his trainer.

    Ruiz, Rhaman, Golota, Vaulev, etc...fought a Don King controlled " championship " series that had bad action and questionable score cards.

    I would have loved for Vitlai to end Ruiz's career. Ruiz soiled the game

    David Haye and Valuev backed out of fights with Vitali.

    You could say Povetkin or Chagaev could have been scheduled, but Wlad fought them instead.

    From my count Vitali fought 14 people that were rated in the top ten, and beat 12 of them.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,422
    48,851
    Mar 21, 2007
    Mendoza - read what you just wrote.

    If most people would agree on 3 out of 4, how is it correct? That would make it incorrect? That's my point?



    Loads of guys. More than that though, testimony of those that punched him was that he was an extremely hard puncher.

    [url]http://ringtv.craveonline.com/news/327215-best-ive-faced-george-chuvalo[/url]

    That's maybe the best chin of all time ranking DeJohn alongside George Foreman for power.

    And by the way, this is exactly the argument that is used to frame Williams as a great puncher.

    Simply put, you want to rank Williams as one of the hardest punchers that Machen met despite a dearth of top fighters knocked out because it helps your case.

    But DeJohn is excluded from your concrete bunker of inarguable punchers. It's silly. Of course DeJohn was a good puncher. Of course Valdes was a puncher. What on earth are you denying it for?

    He took the Williams fight only days removed from a suicide attempt. That draw is one of Machen's best results. Ever. He was falling apart as a human being. He was unable to function as a human within hours of that fight.

    Furthermore you've framed him as one of the best punchers there is. So a draw is surely a good result? Finally, Williams is better than 12-1 Nate Tubbs, who destroyed Corrie Sanders.

    [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ6_BPrWdN4[/url]

    To fight. It's something that has never ever been done before, perhaps.

    If you think it's a stretch to rank it ATG as a comeback, I don't care. I know it's ATG as a comeback. I'm pretty sure you're only denying it because you love Vitali, which is pretty weird when you think about it.

    Machen's comeback from suicidal schizophrenic depression to a shot at a belt isn't just one of the greatest comebacks in heavyweight; it's one of the greatest comebacks in the history of boxing - and one of the greatest comebacks in the history of sport.

    If we disagree it can only be because we understand severe mental illness differently. The list of elite sportsmen who have comeback from clinical depression, the type that makes you want to die, to fight at the highest level is far, far, far, far, far, -bear with me- far, far, far shorter than fighters who have come back from severe physical injury. That's because it's far harder.

    Most mid-ranking top 100 types have losing records against the best - that's why they end up mid-ranking.

    And as i've shown, Machen has a far, far, far, far, far -bear with me- far, far, far better record versus the top men of his time - than Vitali has versus the top men of his! Vitali is hindered by the fact he hardly fought any top men though.



    Rubbish. Off the top of my head, Greg Page, Ike Ibeabuchi, Tommy Morrison, Jack Dillon, Lou Nova, Young Stribling, Ruslan Chagaev, Johnny Risko, Tony Galento, Tony Tubbs, Lamon Brewster, Bonecrusher Smith, Jake Kilrain, Clarence Henry, Lee Q Murray, Frank Slavin never made my list. These are excellent fighters.

    It's easy to say which era is better. The one with Muhammad Ali, Sonny Liston and Joe Frazier is better than the other one.

    Machen just took on more very good guys, and beat more very good guys than Vitali.

    No I don't. I think that ONE small heavy would be the best fighter that Klitschko beat. It's arguable, but it's not absurd. Vitali's competition is that bad.


    Yeah - but you're now arguing that Vitali should be ranked above Machen.

    With someone that ranked Vitali higher than Machen.

    You have to ask: why?
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,422
    48,851
    Mar 21, 2007
    So Machen suffering a complete nervous breakdown is not reason enough to exclude some of his losses from consideration - but this litany of excuses concerning why Vitali met two of the ten best fighters of his generation and lost to both, which includes the above gem, is valid?

    Right.
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    vwhen vits "wants" to fight someone pretty decent, injury comes a calling, and he doesn't fight them ever.

    rahman must have put the fear of god in him, someone whio sparked out postprime lennox (albeit destroyed in rematch) the lennox who stopped him with most of the fight left to spare in worst shape ever.

    do the math.
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005
    I reckon.
     
  10. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,893
    Nov 10, 2012


    Really? that's very debatable, What did Liston do, or whom did he beat that Lennox could not?

    Some of Liston's opponents would have given Lennox a good fight, but not many.
     
  11. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,496
    26,027
    Jan 3, 2007
    I don't see a terribly strong argument for rating Sonny Liston over Lennox Lewis or even haling him as being "better" in any way. Lewis was the best of a division for the better part of about 5 years and through many title fights. Sonny fought far less ranked men and his title reign was short. Lewis was a two time olympic medalist. Liston had virtually no amateur career to speak of. Both men lost to lesser opponents, but defeats to Rahman and McCall weren't as bad as losing to Marty Marshal or Leotis Martin.. No brainer for me.
     
  12. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005



    Liston looks better to me.
    He didn't fight an amazing crop of contenders by any means, but he made short work of most of them.

    It should be noted that Liston lost to Marshall, an 8 round split decision in only his EIGHTH PRO FIGHT.
    And losing to Martin came when he was seriously past it, out of condition, and just fighting on for the money.
    I don't think those defeats are as bad as Lewis losing his titles to McCall and Rahman is big title fights.

    Liston's losses to Clay/Ali are suspicious too.
     
  13. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    547
    Feb 17, 2010
    lewis lost those fights in his supposed prime though, unlike Liston.

    Sonny was in the wrong place at the wrong time for a title run with Ali coming through.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,677
    27,395
    Feb 15, 2006
    I do think that Liston would have found a way to blow it anyway, to be honest.

    Great champions are rare, but those with the mindset for longevity are rarer.

    Liston didn't have it.
     
  15. bonbon

    bonbon Member Full Member

    189
    5
    Jan 16, 2014
    Anyone who thinks Liston is better than Lewis is delusional. Lewis is H2H probably the best ever heavyweight.