Wilfredo Gomez vs Alfonso Zamora

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by red cobra, Apr 6, 2015.


  1. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,584
    Jul 28, 2004
    What if it was Zamora instead of Zarate facing Gomez for Bazooka's super bantam title? 1977 or '78, only in Mexico?
     
  2. Chuck1052

    Chuck1052 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,986
    651
    Sep 22, 2013
    Alfonso Zamora may have had a puncher's chance against Wilfredo Gomez, but that is about it. The odds are overwhelming that Gomez would have destroyed the relatively crude Zamora in short order, much like Carlos Zarate did.

    - Chuck Johnston
     
  3. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    Gomez by ko. If Zarate could destroy Zamora, I think the bigger Gomez could too. If he's smart he'll box for a few rounds, then go in for the kill. If he goes toe to toe with Zamora from the opeing bell, Zamora could get lucky. That would be the only way he wins this.
     
  4. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,584
    Jul 28, 2004
    Yes...Gomez would box...putting on a showcase performance, until deciding that it was time to snuff AZ out, and he would, as has been said already, destroy Zamora much like he did Zarate.
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Typical thread from you.
     
  6. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,584
    Jul 28, 2004
    Then stay the **** away *******!! Okay?
     
  7. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    350
    Jul 13, 2007
    Agree with the consensus...Gomez is technically better, and would get to Zamora...probably early.
     
  8. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,500
    3,031
    Oct 18, 2004
    Wilfredo was just too good for Alfonso to handle. Gomez would kayo Zamora in five rounds.
     
  9. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,458
    4,101
    Jun 28, 2009
    He's right though, red - what's the point? I'm rarely on here these days, but you're like a broken record with this every time I take a glance. Monzon, Napoles, Griffith, Galindez and all your other favourites beating overmatched mugs (and every other **** in their weight class) via the same idle, hero-worshipping non-****ysis. I'm all for freedom of speech, but it doesn't exactly encourage constructive debate, does it? Monzon vs Yori Boy Campas or some other ****. Especially when you're predicting knockdowns in specific rounds as a definitive occurence.

    I reckon you'd get ****ed off pronto if there was a Monzon vs Patterson thread every other week, and you'd be right, because it's pointless (though I doubt you'd go as far as to outright admit that Monzon would get his murdering ****pipe kicked in, instead eulogising how clever and brave he was to never move up in weight etc).

    No offence or anything.
     
  10. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,458
    4,101
    Jun 28, 2009
    Sorry Flea, I know you're more than capable of speaking for yourself (quite colourfully, usually).
     
  11. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,928
    6,810
    Dec 10, 2014
    I disagree. This is a legitimate thread. Zamora was still a very good fighter in '77 and a fight with Gomez would have been interesting, albeit Gomez would most likely win. I've seen much worse fantasy matchup threads.
     
  12. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    350
    Jul 13, 2007
    Seconded. Most of my fantasy fights suck...why do I do it? Cuz it's fun...*Hint sarcasm alert*If anyone feels like my posts are an affront to their superior knowledge of the sport I suggest avoiding the urge to even look at or comment on a thread that is beneath you...
    It's all in fun guys lighten the **** up...
     
  13. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,584
    Jul 28, 2004
    Your post sums up my feelings precisely. I've been stalked and dumped on lately by one particular poster concerning the "quality" of my threads...all I have to say is that you have ups and downs sometimes with these fantasy matchups...sometimes a thread might seem to "intelligensia" like a foregone conclusion, but really, everyone's opinions differ and a plausible case can be made for any thread idea. i consider it fun also, regardless. I guess they're suggesting that if you post a hypothetical match involving a favorite fighter of your's that any opinion that you may have youself is automatically "biased"....and I agree, they should get off their high horses and lighten up.
     
  14. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,584
    Jul 28, 2004
    Yeah, it apparently doesn't count that AZ was one of the "Z Boys" and was undefeated with all knockouts..at least that's the version of him that I was matching Gomez against. Zamora could have made 122 without compromising his innate strengths at all.
     
  15. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    350
    Jul 13, 2007
    True Red...but I gotta say I really like the Flea man...he is one of those indivduals who is generous with posting his films, and my hat is off to him...I appreciate that as a fight fan...but I also think posters should say what they want to say...you want to talk about Monzon? So be it...Burt wants to talk about Greb and Dempsey. So be it. It's all good..I talk about my faves too...I'm a unabashed apologist for several LMR, Napoles, Leonard, even Mayweather...give me a thread involving Floyd, and I'll vote for him 90% of the time.

    Sorry for the rant guys...Just my two cents. Peace.