Catchweights- good or bad for boxing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Apr 14, 2015.

  1. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    catchweight is fine. it makes it possible to see 2 fighters in different division fight each other.
     
  2. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    nobody is being forced to agree to it.
     
  3. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2007
    Messages:
    11,017
    Likes Received:
    42
    I don't mind it when it is needed for 2 fighters from different weight classes to have a bout.

    However, I never think a title should be on the line during a catchweight bout. Full weight limit or not for the title in my view. You can fight for pride and money if you don't want to fight at the full weight limit for the belt.
     
  4. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    86,106
    Likes Received:
    4,096
    I am tired of catchweights, if Cotto is going to pretend to be the 160 lb. champion, he should fight at 160.....................I knew Cotto would refused to fight Golovkin, mandatory of not. Golovkin knocked Geale out, so Cotto decided to fight Geale..............what a crock of ****...................
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    401,653
    Likes Received:
    83,487
    Bad, almost categorically, without exception.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    401,653
    Likes Received:
    83,487
    **** that. One can move up or the other down, or else tough **** we don't get to see it.
     
  7. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    48,579
    Likes Received:
    88
    For me, the main problem is too often they are decided on to make it an advantage for one fighter rather than fair on both.

    There's enough weight classes in this day and age to be able to pick one that suits both fights and I don't think titles should be decided via catchweights
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    401,653
    Likes Received:
    83,487
    :good :deal
     
  9. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    think about that long and hard and i'm sure you'd change your mind.
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    401,653
    Likes Received:
    83,487
    No.

    One up, the other down, or I don't care.
     
  11. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    48,579
    Likes Received:
    88

    Preferably up though, especially in a Ward v Dawson style situation, where Dawson had been fighting at 175 for years.
     
  12. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    oscar-hopkins
    pwill-sergio
    pac-cotto
    floyd-canelo
    chavez-whittaker
    pac-margarito
    pac-jmm3 and 4

    .....these fights wouldn't have happened.
     
  13. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Messages:
    10,740
    Likes Received:
    89
    Both fighters had already competed at the full middleweight limit so no catchweight should have been needed.
    Both fighters had already competed at the full middleweight limit (against each other, no less) so no catchweight should have been needed.
    Both fighters had already competed at the full welterweight limit, so no catchweight should have been needed.
    Both fighters had already competed at the full junior middleweight limit, so no catchweight should have been needed.
    The first case from your list where a guy was moving up and it was over 20 years ago.
    Oh boy what a pity it would have been to have missed out on this most necessary fight!
    3 was a catchweight simply because Golden Boy could match the rights to Marquez's next fight. 4 was not a catchweight fight.

    Literally most of your list supports the idea that catchweights are most often used these days as a way for the bigger draw to gain an advantage. This is pretty much the only interpretation for what Oscar, Pacquiao, Mayweather, and Williams did when insisting on catchweights at divisions they had already competed in.
     
  14. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    13,622
    Likes Received:
    34
    Good. Jumping up and down weight divisions repeatedly is NOT good for your health. Look what happened to Jones.
     
  15. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    48,579
    Likes Received:
    88

    It was coming off the juice that ended him :-(