Has Quigg ever faced a mandatory...

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Brixton Bomber, Apr 15, 2015.


  1. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,109
    Sep 21, 2013
  2. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,092
    Feb 16, 2013
    I don't think so, then again is he a real world champion?
     
  3. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,680
    6,790
    Oct 18, 2009
    Not unless he defeats Rigo.

    The amount of belts in boxing is a farce.
     
  4. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,092
    Feb 16, 2013
    I agree completely

    regular champion, super champions, super duper champions, diamond champion, silver champions, brass champions.

    It will never happen but wouldn't it be beautiful if it went back to just one belt each division.
     
  5. heatman

    heatman Fight Game Connoisseur Full Member

    885
    50
    May 3, 2009
    I don't really think any champion with powerful backers ever has to fight a mandatory. They just pretend they have to when they want to. The quality of mandatory challengers is so low that fights with them are just tune ups.

    While we're on this discussion...what do you guys think about PBC reportedly introducing their own belt. It will presumably mean that there's only 1 champ per division
     
  6. big_daddy

    big_daddy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,517
    25
    Nov 28, 2013
    Wasn't there a Venezuelan who was meant to fight him?

    As for PBC belts they'll be seen as worse than the IBO stuff, and doubt they'll be recognised outside haymonland
     
  7. byron87

    byron87 Active Member Full Member

    833
    0
    Jul 26, 2011
    Salinas was a mandatory. But how can the Wba force a mandatory for the their champions when they have 3 belts? I can't see them having an Interim Eliminator, Regular eliminator etc etc
     
  8. Losg11

    Losg11 Active Member Full Member

    508
    13
    Dec 5, 2014
    Surely the Interim should be Mandated to fight the Regular and the Regular Mandated to fight the Super? (e.g Froch and Ward)

    I'm surprised the other 3 organisations haven't tried to alienate the WBA but rejecting any "unifications" with their many champions.
     
  9. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    Yeah Salinas was a mandatory fight I believe. However I don't think that Regular champions are forced to defend against anyone in particular though, only that the super champion has to face the regular if the regular wants it.
     
  10. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,450
    29,323
    Jan 18, 2010
    Last time I checked he IS the mandatory... for Rigo's WBA belt.
     
  11. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    Apparently he's not a " real " World Champ, but the same people questioning the legitimacy of his World Title, are now demanding he fights mandatories.

    There are a lot of Villages missing somebody.
     
  12. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,109
    Sep 21, 2013
    Answer the question: Has Quigg ever faced a mandatory - yes or no?
     
  13. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,013
    Dec 27, 2010
    Yes we KNOW he's not a "real" World. Champion, but he is A"real " mandatory challenger to a guy who IS...Rigo!

    So WHY won't he take his title shot?
     
  14. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,376
    11,876
    Apr 19, 2010
    because he wants dollar like he said he wishes some one offered him 1.5 mill


    but why should frampton give him a payday should he not have to prove himself like brook gets told :huh:conf

    standards double i dont know

    people dont like domestic fights they like world class fight like khan algieri :oops:
     
  15. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    Len, you know the answer as well as most boxing fans do.

    Quigg vs Frampton is a carbon copy of the situation at Welterweight with Brook and Khan.

    Quigg vs Frampton means big bucks and big exposure for Quigg, in a fight where he has a decent chance of winning.

    Rigo vs Quigg wouldn't make any money and Quigg would likely lose.

    Why won't Frampton fight for a career high payday, in a big PPV event, instead of fighting for peanuts on ITV ?