Anyone think The 1940's Heavies Were On A Par With The 1970's?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Apr 15, 2015.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Any posters think the 1940's decade of heavyweights were on a par with 1970's decade?
    Some names.
    1940's
    Louis
    M Baer
    B Baer
    Walcott
    Charles
    Baksi
    Ray
    Godoy
    Pastor
    Bivins

    1970's
    Ali
    Liston
    Foreman
    Frazier
    Holmes
    ****ey
    Spinks
    Weaver
    Ellis
    Bugner
    Bonavena
    Quarry
    Lyle
    Patterson
    Coetzee
    Young
    Terrell
    Norton
    Shavers
    Foster
    You can furnish anymore names that were active in those decades.
     
  2. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Much as I admire him I don't think Bob Foster deserves to be in the Heavyweight mix of the 70's, when you consider what he achieved there. Plus No, I don't think the 40's was on a par with the 70's. Just the When We Were Kings crowd plus Liston takes care of the top 5 names in your 40's list.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Mac Foster,I should have put an M in front of his surname.
     
  4. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,877
    Oct 8, 2013
    Liston was in his 40's and had only one fight in the decade vs Wepner. He is more a 50's-60's heavyweight. Co*ney is really 80s. If you're going to stretch the availability of the fighters into decades that were not their best than Schmeling should be listed because he did box in the 40s.

    To the question at hand I think on a fight by fight basis the increased size of the 70s heavyweights would give them a marginal edge and they would win more than they would lose against the 40s era although I believe it would be competitive.
     
  5. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    With the interlude of WWII and the lack of film on almost anyone but the champions it is hard to judge.

    Hard to judge how tough Elmer Ray, Turkey Thompson, Lee Q. Murray, Lem Franklin and some of the others were at their best. One thing we can tell is that there was a bit more turnover at the top five in the 1940's than the 1970's.

    "the increased size of the '70's heavyweights would give them a marginal edge"

    "it would be competitive"

    This sums it up for me also.
     
  6. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    1970's for me.
     
  7. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,670
    2,155
    Aug 26, 2004
    :good I see it this way
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    McCvey conveniently left out many good names from the 40s like

    Lee Q Murray
    Lem Franklin
    Turkey Thompson
    Melio Bettina
    Harry Bobo
    Lou Nova
    Roscoe Toles
    Tommy Gomez
    Archie Moore
    Hatchetman Sheppard


    Some of these men were highly rated fearsome punchers who were avoided by louis' camp. They didn't get their shot because of the color of their skin
     
  9. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    On average I'd take the 70s heavies. The size/weight differential wasn't all that much. Quarry, Ellis, Patterson and Young were all as small as (and smaller) than many of the better 40s heavies and look how well they did.
     
  10. Good Cop

    Good Cop Member Full Member

    421
    0
    Mar 23, 2015
    Each era wins some and loses some.

    Mr. Charles over Mr. Foreman is my upset pick of the "duel".
     
  11. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Indeed but you know damn well that those 4 70s guys you mentioned have other intangibles that made them successful, regardless of size. 3/4 had good pop, 4/4 were well schooled talented fighters.

    Frankly the average HW from the 40s were definitely not as skilled or good overall as those 4. This cant really be argued with.. imo. The 70s was stacked with the obvious ATGs (ali foreman frazier) and then a slew of punchers (lyle, mac foster, shavers), pure boxers (ellis, bugner, young) borderline ATG HWs like Norton and a young ATG in larry holmes also..
     
  12. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    It can't? ;) You can say beyond a shadow of a doubt that Jimmy Ellis was better than say, Lee Q. Murray (who was bigger, stronger, harder-hittting and a switch-hitter ala' Marvin Hagler)? Was he or Jerry Quarry better than Jimmy Bivins? I wouldn't bank on it. Not at all, actually.

    True, but so were the 40s. Joe Louis. Ezzard Charles. Jersey Joe Walcott

    The 40s was just as formidable as far as slugging contenders goes. Lem Franklin(whom many experts saw as a harder puncher than Joe Louis), Curtis Hatchetman Sheppard, Elmer Violent Ray, Lee Q. Murray, Rusty Payne, Harry Bobo, Lee Savold, etc.

    Bob Pastor. Jimmy Bivins, Lee Q. Murray, Melio Bettina(both boxer-punchers), etc.

    I don't consider Norton anywhere near an ATG. In fact I'd take just about any big puncher from the 40s to knock him stiff, just like he fell apart against the big hitters of the 70s. Harry Bobo? Lee Q. Murray? I'd take them both to stop Norton early.

    All in all I agree with you. The 70s were the greatest years, imo. But the 40s is a serious contender for that title. It would be like a Marvel vs. DC war.

    Peace
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm stretching nothing I invited posters to furnish their own names of boxers that were active during those decades. I just provided a few names. For example I included Charles in the 1940's one, though he was only rated among the heavies for 1948/1949.
    Please don't ascribe to me agendas and motives I don't possess.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    You are in dire need of a reading comprehension lesson ,and you're overall sarcastic tone is not only uncalled for it is juvenile in the extreme.

    Here is the foot note to my OP.NUMB NUTS

    "You can furnish anymore names that were active in those decades."

    Translated for your benefit ,this means provide your own names of fighters from those boxers active in the appropriate decades .
    Comprende?
     
  15. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    40s

    Joe Louis
    Rocky Marciano
    Ezzard Charles
    Joe Walcott
    Billy Conn
    Max Baer
    Buddy Baer
    Max Schmeling
    Archie Moore
    Jimmy Bivins
    Joey Maxim
    Rex Layne
    Roland LaStarza
    Lou Nova
    Tony Galento
    Primo Carnera
    Abe Simon
    Lem Franklin
    Arturo Godoy
    Tami Mauriello
    Lee Q Murray
    Curtis Sheppard
    Elmer Ray
    Turkey Thompson
    Nino Valdez
    Clarence Henry
    Tommy Farr
    Joe Baksi
    Bob Satterfield
    Pat Valentino

    70s

    Muhammd Ali
    George Foreman
    Joe Frazier
    Ken Norton
    Jimmy Young
    Jerry Quarry
    Duane Bobick
    Earnie Shavers
    Ron Lyle
    Chuck Wepner
    Joe Bugner
    Ron Stander
    Leon Spinks

    If there's any names you want to add to the 40 list, please feel free. If there are any names you want to remind me I forgot from the 70s, don't bother, I'll just call you names and ignore your point.