Pacquiao looked lit sh!t in Bradley 2. I was one of the few people not really impressed with his Algeri performance.
Pacquaio has been slipping for ages but don think hes hit the wall. I think Mayweather dratsically slipped for that 2nd Maidana fight. Pacquaio might be in a better position.
Bradley was considered a top 10 P4P fighter and was coming off a win over Marquez, and Pacquiao won easily. How on earth did he "look like ****"?? How can you look like **** while comprehensively beating an elite fighter like Bradley??
He beat him convincingly, but not nearly as one-sided as people make it out to be. He looked poor in both matches with Bradley. Whether that was Bradley's doing or Pacquiao's remains to be seen. But both fights were ugly.
Now I'm going to call you out. 1. You claimed he beat Bradley and dominated him on many occasions. You said you scored fight 1 with a 119-109 score, or 11-1, in favor of Pacquiao on MULTIPLE OCCASIONS. 2. You used his "dominant" performance (your words, not mine) over Bradley in 2014 to make a case for Pacquiao being P4P#1 and better than Mayweather. Now that the Mayweather fight is official you're back tracking on all of this. Have some diginity and stick to your guns. You're trying to make excuses, excuses are for cowards, remember?
He didn't look great I will say it again take it how you will you can dominate a fighter and not look great.
Mayweather seems less prime to me. Pac is doing what he's always done, kick the **** out of people no named marquez... Floyd struggled with Maidana. I still class both as near prime anyways so maybe the best man win.
Did he really score the first fight 11-1 for Pac? That is scary. I wonder what his scorecards were for the first 3 JMM fights.
I don't know what your definition of A level is, but to me any fighter who's been in the top 10 for a long time is A level. It's one step beneath elite.