Joe Louis vs Archie Moore 1950-1951

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Apr 23, 2015.


  1. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Officially, but several were genuine fights under the exhibition banner.

    Two bouts with Valdez and one with Valentino fresh off the Charles title challenge, are three that were said to be such fights. There's some interesting articles on these somewhere.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,853
    29,310
    Jun 2, 2006
    Who did Louis destroy in between 50/51?


    I've given his three stoppage wins during that period.

    One was a nobody .
    One was a veteran who was one fight away from retirement.
    One was a former fringe contender who had lost his last 4 fights. You are loyal to Louis, but totally unrealistic as to his capabilities in his final 2 years as a fighter.
    And now you are spitting your dummy out because you aren't getting the answer from posters that you wanted and expected.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,494
    26,022
    Jan 3, 2007
    Thanks.
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005

    Walker fought to a 10 round draw with top 5 contender Rex Layne. Most papers had walker winning the fight.

    Savold was number 2 ranked in the world..and world heavyweight champion recognized by BBBC

    beshore went 14 rounds with Charles in a world title fight

    Brion was number 7 heavyweight in the world by ring magazine. Louis won 19 of 20 rounds


    Again Louis is facing Moore here. Why is it so unreasonable for me to believe Louis can beat a light heavyweight with a vulnerable chin? Moore would have no answer for Louis' jab. If Louis connects it's over. Moore won't outsmart Louis and he will be giving up a 35lb weight advantage.

    Louis may have lost to Charles and Marciano but so did Moore. No one else in the division would have beaten Louis other than Marciano and charles
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    Magoo

    Exhibition but most of those exhibitions were like genuine fights..It should be noted that louis flattened the guy who would become number 1 ranked 3 years later
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    Mateo

    For someone who gives George Foreman a lot of credit in the 1990s maybe you should give a 37-year-old Louis more credit guys like Stewart Grimsley shulz would not have won a round against a 1950 Louis. Foreman seemed to struggle more against journeyman in his comeback than Louis did.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,583
    Nov 24, 2005
  8. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,665
    9,751
    Jul 15, 2008
    I never wrote he beats Joe Louis .. I wrote he beats the slow, plodding, hittable near punchless version of 1951 ..
     
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,665
    9,751
    Jul 15, 2008
    SQ, you've spent years building up what a quality fighter Moore was at heavyweight to justify Marciano's victory as a qualification for greatness and now you beat him down to qualify another watered down Marciano victim ..
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    He

    Louis was still a quality fighter in 1951 despite being far past his prime. Good enough to beat Moore whom he sported a 35lb weight advantage on. What's moore gonna do set one of his traps on Louis? Louis was too smart.

    I think Joe Louis was the greatest fighter of all time and greatest sportsman in professional sports history. You defeat any version of Joe Louis that is still a quality win.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  11. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,665
    9,751
    Jul 15, 2008
    So essentially the Marciano victory Moore was not a great accomplishment for ranking him as an all time great heavyweight then by this logic .. ok .. I agree w that. where we differ is that I feel the 1951 Louis was far from being a great fighter, no better than the 1978 version of Ali that fought Spinks if even that good.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,853
    29,310
    Jun 2, 2006
    Afteer losing to Louis on cuts, Walker had a further 11 fights losing all of them and being stopped in 5.What does that say to you?

    The BBB of C was a toothless tiger who tried to engineer moderate British heavyweight Bruce Wood**** into a title he s****ed a win over Savold on a foul and Savold stopped him in the rematch, whereupon the BBB of C promptly
    recognized Savold as Worlds
    Champion after Louis exposed Savold as a past prime in and outer whose best days were over TheBBB of C promptly dropped their absurd claim
    "Prior to this match, Savold was recognized as Heavyweight Champion by the British Boxing Board of Control;
    following this fight, the BBBC recognized Ezzard Charles"


    "If Louis connects it's over?" Why is that ? Men who couldn't carry his spit bucket when he was prime were going the distance with him in1950 &51!

    Brion who himself was nothing special, twice went the distance with Louis, do you think he could have achieved that against even the 1946 Louis?

    Savold was a ringworn past prime 36 year old when he faced Louis he would have one further fight be stopped and retire

    .If you want an assessment of his remaining abilities when he fought Louis, read AJ Liebling's The Sweet Science.
    Moore beat plenty of good jabbers Valdesx2, Johnson x4,
    Maxim x 3 ,Bivins Baker,Henry.
     
  13. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    349
    Jul 13, 2007
    Intiguing fight at that point in time.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,853
    29,310
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've been smiling to myself about this too. I like Suzie's posts but,sometimes--------------
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,747
    Sep 14, 2005
    He,

    By 1955 Archie had established himself as the number 1 heavyweight contender in the world. He defeated top 5 ranked Clarence Henry, knocked out bob baker, and beat number 1 ranked Nino valdes in a title eliminator. Marciano had to fight Moore to solidify his legacy...it was the last number 1 ranked contender left to fight. Archie was a great fighter, a very dangerous puncher and a threat to Marciano. Was Archie the win that made Marciano an all time great? No. However it was an important win for Marciano...a dominating performance over a number 1 rated future hall of famer.

    The Walcott I fight made Marciano an All Time Great