If Floyd loses...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Apr 24, 2015.

  1. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    23,750
    Likes Received:
    3,946
    Will you say he was never that good?
     
  2. Jake LaMotta

    Jake LaMotta Lights Out Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2015
    Messages:
    7,293
    Likes Received:
    1,482
    He was never amazing anyway
     
  3. LordSouness

    LordSouness Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2014
    Messages:
    4,195
    Likes Received:
    691
    He's been the best boxer in the World for over 10 years, hard to argue he "was never that good" and not look like a complete spastic.
     
  4. Anima

    Anima Kinetic Link Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2010
    Messages:
    6,216
    Likes Received:
    453
    He was that good, Manny was better. It doesn't make him any less, it makes the boxer that beat him more.
     
  5. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    50,635
    Likes Received:
    18,358
    He's the best defensive boxer of his era... that is all.

    His careful matchmaking, retirements, and ducking hinders his rating.

    In my eyes, Mayweather has lost to Castillo, arguably to an old DLH and a B level Maidana.
     
  6. Anima

    Anima Kinetic Link Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2010
    Messages:
    6,216
    Likes Received:
    453
    Def lost to castillo, and yes arguably with DLH but Maidana? No way.
     
  7. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    20,453
    Likes Received:
    7
    Are you related to CJ Ross or boxing_master? :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  8. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    50,635
    Likes Received:
    18,358

    Arguably to Maidans. I've only seen the first fight once and I scored it for Maidana...I may have been biased in my scoring, but I know many people had it close... I'll give it a watch sometime and re-score it, I usually don't like watching Mayweather fights more than once because they are usually dull and boring.
     
  9. Beast-Mode

    Beast-Mode Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    Messages:
    1,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    ya think!!!!!!!
     
  10. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2013
    Messages:
    39,120
    Likes Received:
    1,802
    Never that good? No. Just that he's 2nd best and Pacquiao is #1.
     
  11. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    50,635
    Likes Received:
    18,358

    because Mayweather fans aren't biased right....:deal :patsch
     
  12. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    that's not going to stand up.

    his resume will get scrutized and all you kool aid drinkers will realize that a lot of his "greatness" is based on hype. he just sold himself well.
     
  13. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    42,063
    Likes Received:
    3,646
    People are ridiculous.

    At the very least, Mayweather and Pacquiao are two of the top fighters of this era and sure-fire HOFers. And not questionable HOFers where you go "THAT guy in in?" (McGuigan, Gatti).

    A lot of the people who say Mayweather is overrated and not really that good are just weird "Pac****s" who say it to comfort themselves so they can feel better about their hero's chances on May 2nd. Same thing with "*****s" who bash Pacquiao and bring up losses 10 years ago, or the Marquez KO. Well bringing up KO6 isn't exactly gonna make a Mayweather win look better since a smaller guy, whom Mayweather already beat 12-0, did it first.

    The more you bash one fighter and say he's not that great, it doesn't exactly say much for the other guy should he win.

    "What's the big deal, he beat a guy that was not that great anyway'
     
  14. Beast-Mode

    Beast-Mode Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    Messages:
    1,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    The hell that got to do with you being unable to score a fight fairly?
     
  15. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2013
    Messages:
    39,120
    Likes Received:
    1,802
    Losing to Pacquiao isn't getting exposed unless he's demolished quickly or shut out. And even then, it doesn't bring into question his resume. It just means Pacquiao was/is the better fighter between the two. Why does losing to Pacquiao have to destroy his entire legacy?