The official Mayweather vs. Pacquiao aftermath trash receptacle

What do you mean what happened there? What happened is I'm willing to allow mods to check my IP, to see if I have any alts, but Hans won't because he clearly has something to hide. I mean seriously please answer this question, what do you have to lose if you don't use alts? Am I the only one that thinks it's extremely fishy that he won't take the offer?

 

48-0 :deal

 

I've just said you are on, knowing full well you'll just alt up anyway, but I'm not bothered because the way you are going ellerbe account will be registered untenable by then and you'll have another alt claiming every black guy who doesn't win gets robbed after the absolute hiding you get day in day out on this forum.

 

ellerbe you just selected a different IP for each account through these proxy/ vpn accounts. Not exactly rocket science.

 

He goes on about how he's seen MODs expose loads of guys when he's only been around since post Porter schooling....I haven't seen a MOD be ****d to do that since I've been on 2 years ago....yet this is his first account

 

You're confirming that you're on for the IP check right? Write that you give the mods permission to check your IP on this post, and then we'll both message IB or another mod to check our IPs and expose every account we use.

 

What I was asking is, did you really not have another account before the Brook/Porter fight? Or did you actually just happen to join the forum right after and start a thread about Porter getting robbed? Seems an odd coincidence.

 

Do you really think a guy that has tens of thousands of posts within 2 years, and gets banned on a regular base doesn't have alts? The fact that he gets banned so many times is just telling on what kind of poster he is, a **** one that gets destroyed by me, and a poster that clearly uses alts.

 

I haven't even been here a month. I've only seen a mod call someone out once. But if you don't have any alts seems like there's nothing to lose in agreeing to an IP check.

 

better question is how floyd will react when a pac left händ connects flush

 

My first account is the one with 100 posts and 3k v cash, the other account I have. I was rarely active on the forum, and changed the username because I didn't like it. I never had an argument with Hans on that account, nor did I ever pick a winner for Brook/Porter, or criticize Brook. I can guarantee that, and since I only have 100 posts, you can check all of them. He's just paranoid because he's been owned so many times, that he assumes they're all me.
I started using that account again recently(barely though) because I lost all my vcash on this account. When I made my Ellerbe account, I got into more debates(since people looked past my posts and just judged me solely on my username) so the forum got more interesting so I started being a much more active member(though not half as active as Hans with his tens of thousands of posts).

 

Sounds fair.

 

So answer this question. Is it fishy that someone that accuses others of having alts won't take a ban bet if he had nothing to hide? Is he not just nto exposing himself as someone that has an alt?

For the record hans claims that he hasn't seen a mod do that in years, well I've seen IB expose several posters this year, and he confirmed boxing master was indeed from california by checking his IP. So I don't see any problem asking IB to check for us. If he says no, then fine, but at least we can ask right, unless someone is scared ****less at the possibility of IB checking.

 

OH and for the record, I'm not ban betting 3 months for a perm ban for the Brook situation, that offer is only for the IP check.

 

Does seem suspect. I don't see why you don't just agree, Hans. If you swear you don't have an alt then who cares. Just agree to the IP check.