Where Does Mayweather Rank on your ATG List?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Gannicus, May 5, 2015.


  1. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    In order to rank the fighter, you have to scrutinise his career as you're now comparing it against the very best.

    Floyd Mayweather's Fight with Manny Pacquiao
    I'm sorry but Manny Pacquiao is truly 'past prime' in all respects. Just because he is fast, it doesn't mean he is as fast as he used to be. I'm not accepting the idea that Manny is just 'a little past prime'. Mayweather IMO is a little past prime.
    Pac has been on the slide since 2011, that's four years ago now. He's had over 60 fights, been in brutal wars and is 36 years old, whilst being an aggressive fighter.
    Also the KO loss to Marquez had stolen the very threat he had to offer against Mayweather - the ability to just walk over shots from bigger punchers like Cotto, Morales etc. and bigger guys - a psychological threat. If a prime Pacquiao was fighting Mayweather, the fight would have at least been different in that respect.
    Marquez had stated Manny was getting easier to fight as he was focussing on boxing more, so less punch output and it plays towards Mayweather's hands.
    Manny also had a torn rotator cuff injury going into the fight - which is severe enough that he needs surgery otherwise it will be a permanent problem, he'll also face a year off as a result.
    Therefore, Mayweather beat (8-4 IMO) a surgery requiring, past prime Manny Pacquiao. That's hardly a big legacy fight in the grand scale of things.
    With Leonard-Hagler, they were both faded. With Mayweather, he's only slightly faded.

    In my opinion, Mayweather lost to Castillo in the first fight (a rotator cuff injury being the main factor here). I'm not going to call it a victory for Mayweather, just like I don't say Chavez and Whitaker drew.

    With that said:
    47-1
    W Pacquiao (past prime + injured)
    W Castillo 2
    W Alvarez
    W Corrales
    W Hatton
    W Genaro
    W Canelo
    W Cotto
    W Maidana x 2
    W Judah
    W De La Hoya (past prime)
    W Marquez (fat and slow, cheated by Mayweather on scales)
    W Chavez
    W Mosley (very past prime, ancient)
    L Castillo (avenged loss and injured shoulder, this isn't a major, major deal)
    W good contenders
    Belt from 130-154.
    Second greatest Super Featherweight legacy of all time.

    38 years old. Great consistency, pretty decent longevity (not to be overrated). He didn't fight that often. He took 2 years off, ducking stylistic threats in Williams, Margarito and obviously prime Pacquiao. He has a defensive style, Hopkins has been able to last in this modern age because of a defensive style.

    Longevity is not to be measured in the number of years, but consistency during these years, given the number of fights. Mayweather has only fought approx 2 fights a year.

    Whitaker beat a slightly past it Chavez, but Manny was worse off vs Mayweather. Chavez is a more dangerous fight too, so Whitaker deserves more credit for his victory over Chavez.

    The reason why I mention Whitaker is because I have him around 20th.

    Mayweather definitely gets his props for fighting guys who come in on fight night heavier than him. He fought a 170lb Canelo for example, although Canelo is hardly the monster that Whitaker fought in Vasquez at 154.
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,558
    Nov 24, 2005
    He's a great fighter.
    I doubt he'd make my top 50.
     
  3. Oxygene2

    Oxygene2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,042
    95
    May 16, 2006
    I don't think Mayweather definitively lost Castillo I but I have scored it for Castillo before. I don't think it was daylight robbery.


    Now, it's really hard for me to place Floyd. I'd need to read books and truly study the entire history of boxing. All I'm gonna say is; he's the best of his era. If we assume that the talent pool across eras has remained quite constant — though differently distributed between the divisions; sometimes a strong heavyweight era, sometimes a strong welterweight era, etc — then if a boxer is the best of his era, then he's got to be quite high up there.

    Where exactly? The much better posters than myself here can give you some real answers, but I can't place Floyd precisely. I can say that he's the best since Whitaker.. or the greatest since Whitaker.

    Peak Roy Jones is probably more unbeatable than peak Floyd but Floyd is almost undoubtedly greater.
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,481
    23,746
    Jan 3, 2007
    He's easily top 50 and then some.
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,334
    Jun 29, 2007
    Way up there. Mayweather isn't the type of guy I root for, but his skills are undeniable. He's not only fast, he's got the best defense in the center of the ring in the history of the welter weight division. Opponents only land 17% on him, even when he's slightly past his prime. Amazing. His footwork and speed is excellent.

    On defense Mayweather is every bit as good as Willie Pep or Pernell Whitaker who should rate as ATG's at light weight and feather weight.

    His punching accuracy is on the money, and he hits hard enough with the counter right to deter most.

    Unlike Roy Jones, Mayweather can take a punch to the head or body.

    Yes--He can get caught in the ropes or on the corner. His ability to cover up, and quickly escape is very impressive.

    Mayweather has beaten several hall of fame fighters. If he wants to be 50-0, he can get there. His resume among those who retired undefeated is likely #1.
     
  6. Oxygene2

    Oxygene2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,042
    95
    May 16, 2006
    ^^^

    How would have May's defence fared against SRL and Hearns at 147? They enter the ring at about 147.. none of the modern day bull with "welterweights" weighing 155+.
     
  7. Izaak97

    Izaak97 Active Member Full Member

    1,424
    108
    May 9, 2012
    I only rate Sugar Ray Leonard above him.
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,481
    23,746
    Jan 3, 2007
    My guess is quite well. But I wouldn't favor him to beat those guys given that Mayweather wasn't prime at 147.
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,558
    Nov 24, 2005
    Not for me.
    Okay, I admit I haven't got a top 50 set in stone, but I can easily reel off 30 or 40 who I've seen who were greater. So probably not top 50, or maybe just slips in, I dunno.

    That doesn't detract from his greatness though. Top 50 requires ridiculous levels of quality and achievements.
     
  10. Bullet

    Bullet Member Full Member

    484
    10
    Jul 24, 2014
    Top 15 or something

    No order

    Greb
    Robinson
    Gans
    B. Leonard
    Armstrong
    Langford
    Ray Leonard
    Ali
    Louis
    Archie Moore
    Roy Jones
    R. Duran
    Ezzard Charles
    Eder Jofre
    JC Chavez
    Hagler
    Mayweather
    W. Gomez
    Pep
    Whitaker
     
  11. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,481
    23,746
    Jan 3, 2007
    You're entitled to your opinion and I won't disrespect it. But I highly doubt that there are very many honest or knowledgeable people who would reel off the names of " 30 or 40" fighters who they feel are better than Floyd Mayweather. I might be able to list a few - Ray Robinson, Henry Armstrong, Ezzard Charles, maybe Sandy Sadler? Beyond that it gets dicey. He had an amazing amateur career and won his first belt with 17 pro fights against a solid champion. He has since championed in five weight classes and has claim to 25 world title fight wins. He's beaten several hall of famers, a number of title holders, countless ranked men and has reached the mark of 48-0. He's been ranked top 10 p4p for about 15 years and #1 p4p for perhaps 6 years give or take... At 38 years of age he's still the best in the world at a point in life when most greats were finished.
     
  12. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,558
    Nov 24, 2005

    Well, this forum came up with this a couple of years ago :

    [url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=459918[/url]

    He's at #47.

    It's not my list, and I disagree with a lot of it. But I respect the knowledge of the people who contributed to it.

    So Robinson, Armstrong, Charles and Saddler are your top 4, and you struggle beyond that to name someone else above Floyd?
    I don't think many would agree with that.
     
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,481
    23,746
    Jan 3, 2007
    Oh we can slice it and dice it any way we want.. I'm sure there are people who rank Camacho above Floyd as preposterous as that would be... You could legitimately ad Greb, Langford and a few others, but I don't think its clear cut.. But listing FORTY or more fighters who should rank above Floyd Mayweather Jr., is insane to say the least.
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,558
    Nov 24, 2005
    So, McGrain's list thread is insane ?
    Some of the better postors of this forum put their heads together, along with McGrain, who is pretty sensible, and came up with that list, and you think it's "insane" ?

    You're saying Greb and Langford are NOT clear cut above Floyd ?

    I think you're the one who is more out of step with the consensus, compare your statements to my statement.

    I do respect your opinion, but you must know it's a minority one around here, for sure.
     
  15. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,481
    23,746
    Jan 3, 2007

    Thanks. But rating a fighter who's career is still in progress is a touchy thing for some people. It also doesn't help when said fighter has an image that don't sit well with fans. Give it 20 years, and it'll be like pouring miracle grow on tomatoes.