The public perception of the fight

Sounds like it would be considered one sided.

 

Yes, if it were the other way around, people would be satisfied, ignore Floyd's injuries, call him a fraud and move on.

 

public dksab:deal

 

So sick of seeing idiots on Facebook who have just watched boxing for the 4th time in their life proclaim to be experts, it's exhausting. I have to come on here to gain some sanity back...and then up pops boxing_master and his alts

 

"Edillor said the MRI showed the tear is not only on one of either ligament, tendon and muscle but to all of those."


Pac was ****ed going into the fight had only one arm

 

all stakeholders did everything to get their money

 

No.
That's hardly any punches whoever throws and lands them. Makes no difference.

Ok ... I guess in theory, if they are brutal punches.
I mean, it could mean 5 knockdowns each or something. That would be a good fight.

 

And that's nobody's fault but his. Know why? Because #noexcuses, that's why!

Didn't I tell you #noexcuses before the fight? Didn't I tell you? And you didn't listen.

 

https://ifunny.co/fun/1JOVSGQt2

 

http://ifunny.co/fun/MwdGUdQt2


Floyd, you're supposed to hug your wife and hit your opponent not the other way around.

 

People expected to see a classic where the aggressor makes the defensive boxer fight. These kind of fights do make a classic, but Pacquiao just wasn't good enough on the night to make Floyd dig deep, so in the end Floyd won an easy fight. **** happens.

 

well in fairness he was fighting with only one arm. Imagine what he coulda done with both arms...