Who has a more legitimate win Cotto over martinez of floyd vs PAc?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mr. STRUGG, May 5, 2015.

  1. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    I got cotto. miguel was moving up.
    Cotto finished martinez off.
    your thoughts.
     
  2. tennis

    tennis Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    5
    Cotto by far

    May couldn't even dominate a shot one handed fighter
     
  3. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh!

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2012
    Messages:
    74,931
    Likes Received:
    42,548
    Floyd v.s Pac
     
  4. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    can you give us your reason? we just stated ours.
     
  5. CST80

    CST80 The Hesitant Nihilist Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2013
    Messages:
    262,411
    Likes Received:
    268,028
    Cotto didn't finish off anybody he had a concussed one legged Sergio who was a sitting duck in front of him and couldn't get a legitimate KO. Floyd vs Pac was s*** as well. Neither Floyd nor Cotto deserve very much credit.
     
  6. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    you took the words out of me. :lol::lol:
     
  7. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    38,568
    Likes Received:
    8,129
    Martinez was far more gone than Pacquiao was.
     
  8. fruitpunch

    fruitpunch Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages:
    5,417
    Likes Received:
    3
    Both legitimate wins

    But Cotto stopped Martinez when he came in as underdog so it was more impressive to me
     
  9. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh!

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2012
    Messages:
    74,931
    Likes Received:
    42,548
    Martinez was shot to absolute ****ing bits...... I'm not fan of Floyd, and Floyd/Pac was a stinker, but it certainly means more and was definitely the more impressive win.
     
  10. Stylez G.

    Stylez G. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2012
    Messages:
    9,237
    Likes Received:
    13
    Floyd vs. Pacquiao. Pacquiao was ranked as the second or third best fighter in the sport and looked pretty good in his last three outings. Despite Pacquiao's complaints about his shoulder afterwards, there wasn't any noticeable indication of a problem during the fight.

    On the other hand, Martinez looked terrible in his bouts prior to fighting Cotto. He had come off of knee surgery, and it was pretty obvious from the first round that his leg was not right at all. He still can barely walk a year later.
     
  11. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    because............let me guess........cotto dominated him more than floyd?:lol:
     
  12. LondonRingRules

    LondonRingRules Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2011
    Messages:
    10,520
    Likes Received:
    1,137
    Cotto vs Martinez. Pacquiao is ****.
     
  13. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,584
    Likes Received:
    0

    pacquiao was shot and was aggressive with a freaking torn rotator cuff.
    Martinez was stop and got knocked down a couple of times by a smaller man.
     
  14. cslb

    cslb Puerto Rican Uppercut Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2014
    Messages:
    20,820
    Likes Received:
    12,771
    Both equally legitimate. You can only fight the actual man in front of you, not some hypothetical version of him.
     
  15. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    i agree with your second statement.