Colin Hart's top 5 all time welterweights.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Apr 29, 2015.


  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,124
    8,569
    Jul 17, 2009
    On a H2H basis,I'd take the Leonard of the first Hearns fight over any welter in history apart from the original Sugar.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,221
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that Ryan and Walcott would belong in any top ten.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,075
    Jun 2, 2006
    That's a very valid point ,the counter argument is of course,how many of them would you pick to beat him?
     
  4. tennis

    tennis Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,231
    5
    May 5, 2013
    agreed

    maybe even better than srr
     
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,136
    13,084
    Jan 4, 2008
    I'd rate them all highly, although he never beat the best version of Duran at the weight. But what also weighs heavily for me is how stylistically different they were. One of the best pure boxers, one of the best boxer-brawlers and one of the best boxer-punchers. It's quite rare to beat masters of three different styles.

    And it also weighs in that he easily flattened the rest of the contenders he fought at the weight. Never really had problems with anyone he shouldn't have problems with.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,075
    Jun 2, 2006
    You're the guy who has Honeyghan in his top
    fourteen:patsch
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,075
    Jun 2, 2006
    Robinson was clearly better at 147 than at 160lbs , you have it **** about face.
     
  8. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    I often hear this term but how do you get a lucky punch in boxing? Did Ray not mean to hit Tommy?! Did Tommy deliberately hang his chin out?!
     
  9. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Never liked Leonard but now watching him on video he is miles ahead of most of the Welterweights since his time. Certainly an ATG and a better fighter than Hearns overall.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,075
    Jun 2, 2006
    Amended. top fourteen, still too high for Honeyghan.
    Griffith
    McClarnin
    Rodriguez
    Napoles
    Gavilan
    Leonard
    Robinson
    Walcott
    Trinidad
    DeLahoya
    Basilio
    Britton
    Mayweather
    Paquiao
    Lewis
    Walker
    Armstrong
    Zivic
    Ross
    Petrolle
    Williams
    Burley
    Bratton
    Starling
    Hearns
    Benitez
    McGirt
    Breland
    McCrory
    Taylor
    Whitaker
    Mosley
    Palomino
    Cuevas
    Graham
    Brown
    Curry* Weight drained when Honeyghan beat him .
    All superior to Honeyghan
     
  11. MaxDamage

    MaxDamage Member Full Member

    169
    105
    May 2, 2015
    Ray Leonard at 11, what kind of crack you're smoking? He got win over Hearns, Duran and Benitez for ****'s sake! Trinidad at 7? His biggest win at welter is a robbery over De La Hoya, he spent nearly a decade knocking out nobodies and has been, what did he do to deserve top 10? Ike Quartey higher than Jose Napoles??
     
  12. MaxDamage

    MaxDamage Member Full Member

    169
    105
    May 2, 2015
    Is anyone aside from Hagler and Barkley got an easy fight with Hearns? Hearns is in top 5 ATG welter in most lists I've seen, that's why Ray Leonard win over a prime Hearns is so significant. About Trinidad and Quartey, not that they're bad but there are boxers more accomplished that them. Take Luis Rodriguez for example. Unified WBA/WBC welterweight champ, beaten Emile Griffith, Benny Paret, Hurricane Carter, Curtis Cokes, Georgie Benton and Bennie Briscoe. Did Trinidad and Quartey have a better resume than him?
     
  13. MaxDamage

    MaxDamage Member Full Member

    169
    105
    May 2, 2015
    It seems that you value longevity and dominance in a division more than quality of opponents, which I prefer. That's okay. I just can't agree on Ray Leonard outside top 10. He didn't have long stretch of dominance, sure, but look but who he bet! And Hearns is not green. He was 32-0 and demolished HOFamer Pipino Cuevas for the title, he is in his prime. Fight was scheduled for 15 rounds back then and they paced themselves for 15 rounds. Ray won fair and square, that is.
    Mayweather with wins over Mosley, Pacquiao, Cotto and Hatton is already in top 10, but Mosley is in no way in top 10, or 20 for that matter. His biggest win at welter is a split decision over De La Hoya, followed by 3 defenses against unheralded opponents. Then he got whipped twice by Vernon Forrest. Does that sound impressive to you? His second win over DLH is in LMW so it doesn't count, then of course he got whipped by Winky Wright. His win over Margarito is amazing, but Margarito's handwrap scandal made me think twice about his credential. And don't get me start on Mosley's PED allegation.
     
  14. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    That is what he said. Here are his exact words.

    While Britton and Robinson are almost equal at Welterweight (in terms of achievement); the later one was there clear better than at Middleweight.

    Admittedly not easy to comprehend, but clear enough.
     
  15. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    At the absolute peak of his prime, and as an overwhelming favourite Leonard lost to a career Lightweight Duran. For that NOT to be counted against him is pure fanboyism. Also it is pure idiocy to rank him directly behind Ray Robinson.

    Furthermore much is made of the 14th round win over the severely weight drained Tommy Hearns. A man who went on to fight for a further 25 years, never even attempting to make 147 again.