Pac was never a serious threat to floyd not even in 2009

I read Pacquaio is filing domestic violence charges against Floyd.

Yoru honor, the defendant Manny Pacquiao was made to look like a biotch in the fight of the century. We will show Floyd has a repeated pattern of treating women like this. We have video of him slapping Manny Pacquiao like a biotch for for 12 rounds! :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

The difference, Mosley does not have a surgery.

Before the fight(few weeks ago), Roach already hinted that there is a problem with Pac's right. Pac has a 12 round sparring session where he only used his left. Pac missed shadow boxing. Pacquiao missed sparring sessions. :good

Floyd himself admitted that he has a spy that told him Pac has problems with his training.

 

Does he do anything for Floyd's resume ?

 

You saw what Pacuiao is like without PEDs saturday night. The world saw. No energy. Tired from doing nothing. No movement. No volume punches. No speed. I rest my case.

 

Agreed.

It pushes Floyd up on the all-time rankings, just obviously not as much as it would have it they had fought in 2010 when both guys were better and Pacquiao was on a tear.

 

So Mayweather wanted a diminished Pac ?
He didn't fancy fighting the Pac who demolished Hatton and Cotto.
I see.

 

Only packroaches think it din't help Floyd's legacy. Boxing already had him as #1P4P and Pac #2P4P. Guess where Pac is now. #5P4P. :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl FIFTH of his generation. Your boy got schooled.

 

Level playing field is all Floyd has ever asked. Pac didn't do RBT for Hatton or Cotto.

People forget how God has cursed Floyd. Floyd always fights with injuries requiring Xylocaine (the same drug Pac needed). The difference is Pac whines that he needs surgery. Floyd didn't whine about his hands.

 

I'm not a Pacroach, and I expected him to lose.
But I'm not following your argument.

You said Pacquiao was an "exposed limited fighter", so how does beating a limited, basic or one-dimensional fighter do much for Floyd's legacy ?
If Pacquiao was "exposed" then he can't have been much good to start with, a bit of a fraud ? You can't "expose" a genuine great fighter, it can only be a fraud.
And since he was slightly past his best too, at the least, then how does this win do a lot for Mayweather ?

You might be right. I saw Marquez knock this same guy out in less than 6 rounds. Out cold. 2 1/2 years ago.

A limited fraud, 36-year-old, been iced in 6 rounds by a guy Floyd already beat .... how's that a GREAT win for Floyd ?

 

I have to agree whilst the fact that I'm a huge fan of manny he just never really had a technical, on paper shot at winning this fight. He always required the X factor if he had any chance of beating Floyd, at no point in their respective careers did manny have an advantage.

 

I've been saying this for FIVE LONG YEARS, Pac takes the test, he'll look as ordinary as any of Floyd's opponents and Floyd won't get credit for it because he'll school him. The irony is if the fight was close Floyd's legacy would go up in some people's eyes but because he dominated him, people are searching for excuses why Pac is so bad. Pac is a limited fighter. He can't cut off the ring and as soon as he gets countered by a maestro he becomes clueless. It took one single round to see this.

Floyd is just that much better than Pac.

 

Floyd was scared for his health

 

Manny agreed to FULL TESTING 4 years ago.

 

Wow dude shut up

 

I disagree, the Pac who fought Hatton would of given Floyd a lot of trouble..