Brook v Gavin PPV????!?!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by teddybaldock, May 7, 2015.


  1. Izaak97

    Izaak97 Active Member Full Member

    1,424
    108
    May 9, 2012
    Three world title fights on one card definitely merits PPV.
     
  2. Nowitzki4Prez

    Nowitzki4Prez Active Member Full Member

    1,388
    1
    Apr 23, 2015
    King of Sports?

    Like cross domination? I never thought about it that way.


    Michael Jordan but good at baseball or something?
     
  3. Nowitzki4Prez

    Nowitzki4Prez Active Member Full Member

    1,388
    1
    Apr 23, 2015
    [yt]tuiDMJEtkgI[/yt]


    [yt]sCVvZxaZStA[/yt]
    [yt]8vm7DxEuhEU[/yt]
     
  4. teddybaldock

    teddybaldock Active Member Full Member

    990
    867
    Oct 18, 2010
    Alphabet titles none of them are lineal titles or anything, Kevin Mitchell, lee Selby.. Are not PPV fighters, and the main event is just brook in a walkover. Meaningless fight which Gavin has done nothing to earn.. Glorified sparring match
     
  5. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    Isn't Mitchell fighting for WBC which is seen as the lineal title?
     
  6. teddybaldock

    teddybaldock Active Member Full Member

    990
    867
    Oct 18, 2010
    no lol Mitchell is 100% not fighting for the lineal title
     
  7. dublynflya

    dublynflya Stand your ground Son!! Full Member

    5,727
    7
    Oct 30, 2009
    :lol:

    There you go again!!

    UK residents have to pay less than £20 for ppv. I don't mind that at all (it shouldn't be ppv though).

    Will you be buying it? I hope so! Im sure Kell would appreciate your support (and enjoy spending his share of your score).

    If you don't buy it, will you be watching it? Go on, watch the mighty Special K (The Ring Magazine's number 1 Welterweight) work his magic against the formidable machine that is Frankie Gavin. :lol:
     
  8. dublynflya

    dublynflya Stand your ground Son!! Full Member

    5,727
    7
    Oct 30, 2009
    An alphabet title can be a lineal title.. It simply depends on which fighter is holding which belt.
     
  9. Nowitzki4Prez

    Nowitzki4Prez Active Member Full Member

    1,388
    1
    Apr 23, 2015
    Olympic Boxing and Olympic Taekwondo
     
  10. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    WBC is widely consider the lineal title. Cotto is lineal champ at 160, he holds WBC, despite the fact that probably 99% of boxing fans think GGG is better. Danny Garcia hold WBC, yes he is probably the best fighter also but he is lineal champ. Jhonny Gonzales was seen as lineal at Featherweight before he lost to Gary Russell Jnr and he was WBC. Stevenson was many times considered lineal belt holder even though 80-85% of people think Kovalev beats him and he holds WBC. It isn't the fighter that makes the title lineal it is more the prestige of the green belt that makes it the lineal title.
     
  11. beachie17

    beachie17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,849
    2
    Jun 4, 2014
    To be fair Linares is probably the best champion at lightweight now given that Crawford has vacated, or at least I believe he has. Heard he has but whether that was a duff source I don't know.
     
  12. EubankJRfanboy

    EubankJRfanboy Member Full Member

    238
    0
    Apr 26, 2015
    Many good points on both sides in this thread.

    One thing we can all agree on is that Hearn understands the local dynamic of the UK. He understands the pride that different parts of the nation put behind their fighters. So with Selby, you have 3 million people in Wales. You could expect 50k tuning in for his fight. Mitchell a proud ****ney, could bring in another 40-50k, Brook a Yorkshireman is deserving of a move to PPV seeing as how Khan, Haye, Froch, Hatton, have all forayed that direction in recent years. Brook will bring another 50k in off his own merit. Then you have Joshua, and let's not forget a very valid fight between Blackwell and Ryder. Absolute stellar night of boxing and in all honesty compared to May Pac. It's not bad.
     
  13. dublynflya

    dublynflya Stand your ground Son!! Full Member

    5,727
    7
    Oct 30, 2009
    :good

    Good post and an enjoyable read.
     
  14. glovesofcrimson

    glovesofcrimson Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    7
    Sep 14, 2013
    Follows up Porter with Dan and Gavin... okay. I understand Hearn couldn't secure Khan but he must've known that was a great possibility way in advance. Not exactly unforgivable if he secures Rios, Thurman or Marquez for the next one, he's staying busy and capitalizing on his success I get that but these two wins, assuming he disposes of Gavin are not even 'good' wins, they're okay and keep it ticking over.
     
  15. Pro Punter

    Pro Punter Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,140
    7
    Mar 12, 2014
    It really could not be any worse than last week, however, Sky Sports Subscribers should not be required to fork out PPV charges for boxing already paid for.

    If the fights cannot be made - fook the greedy cants.

    Matchroom have failed the Sky Sports Subscribers and PPV is simply another con.