Should Louis have fought more than two black men in his 26 title defenses?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, May 8, 2015.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,192
    25,474
    Jan 3, 2007
    boy did the boxing world ever get screwed when Louis didn't fight Elmer Ray.. A top rated challenger who had just won FIFTY strait fights with FORTY FOUR knockouts and wins over Walcott and Savold.. Of course the fight couldn't be agreed upon until Ray just HAD to give Jersey a rematch which resulted in a razor thin loss, and low and behold Walcott gets the title fight....
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,602
    27,274
    Feb 15, 2006
    In hindsight, Louis should probably have fought Ray, in order to avoid a match with Walcott.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,192
    25,474
    Jan 3, 2007
    Instead of doing the same thing in reverse and for the same reason.
     
  4. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,433
    Feb 10, 2013
    Some on here keep *****ing about Franklin not getting a title shot but completely ignore that Franklin's manager didnt want Franklin to fight Louis. He was scared ****less of Franklin getting his ass whipped and was more than happy to knock around and fight contenders for a bunch of mid level purses than fight for one big purse and lose credibility with a loss. It was the same tactic he used later on with Kid Matthews when Matthews had a title shot against Maxim. Instead of taking it and likely (in Hurley's mind) losing, he took what was a lesser risk by moving up and facing Marciano in an elimination. If Matthews got beat he could always claim he was just a LHW out of his depth, if he won he would have been more bankable. You can claim Louis ducked Franklin all you want and complain about how Franklin deserved this fight more than some of the guys Louis fought but at the end of the day you couldnt force Franklin into the fight even if he had been given it.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,754
    29,149
    Jun 2, 2006
    And my argument was that Simon was pencilled in AFTER Franklin crashed and burned against Pastor.I don't think I'm a fool and I don't think you are, so can we leave the name calling out?
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,192
    25,474
    Jan 3, 2007
    Wasn't calling you a fool.. But Simon fought Louis in March of 1942 while Franklin fought Past a month earlier in February.. Both these fights took place just 4 and 5 months after Simon and Franklin's last meeting. Did Jacobs really plan to fight Franklin, and then automatically insert Simon in just a month after Franklin lost to Pastor? Personally when we look at the time frames along with Jacob's proposal to Franklin's people that he fight another contender, it doesn't seem to ad up. It looks more like Joe Louis was already destined to fight Simon regardless, and the whole issue really had nothing to do with Franklin losing but more so Simon's ticket sales value.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,754
    29,149
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've never suggested that Franklin was in the frame, I don't know that he was ,and you don't know that he wasn't. You have made a lot of conjectural assumptions ,none of which are supported by hard facts.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,754
    29,149
    Jun 2, 2006
    Fifty straight fights and 2 names among the lot of them one was past prime and the other was a split decision win.
    Lamar Clark could probably have racked up most of those guys. Why no;
    Bivins
    Mauriello
    Sheppard
    Thompson
    Maxim
    Bettina
    Baksi
    During those 4 years?
     
  9. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,192
    25,474
    Jan 3, 2007
    Not really. The only thing that this argument really boils down to is that Lem Franklin was more qualified to fight for the title in early 1942 than was Simon. Do you agree or disagree? And please note that Franklin's loss to Pastor is irrelevant so kindly leave that out when choosing your answer..

    Thanks.
     
  10. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,192
    25,474
    Jan 3, 2007
    Winning 50 strait fights with 44 KO's was unheard of in those days, let alone having two wins over quality named guys ( one of whom somehow DID go on to fighting for the title. )
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,754
    29,149
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've said about 4 times the window for opportunity was very narrow less than a month, do you want to crucify someone for that? Do you think Louis should have fought Ray instead of the number one contender Walcott too?
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,754
    29,149
    Jun 2, 2006
    He somehow went on to fight for the title because he beat Ray in the return.
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,602
    27,274
    Feb 15, 2006
    I don't think we can say that he was willfully avoiding Ray, based on the available evidence.

    It is perfectly reasonable to suggest, that he simply fought Walcott because he was the better contender, and had defeated Ray.

    I would add that he was not shy about getting in the ring with Ray for exhibitions, and actually met him at least three times.
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,192
    25,474
    Jan 3, 2007
    yes with an equally "close decision" that you seemingly half credited Ray for getting in the first fight.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,754
    29,149
    Jun 2, 2006
    In one of which Louis kod him.