Adrian Broner vs Shawn Porter official

You like the "not showing" up excuse a lot don't you. Why can't you just give Broner credit for a pick you made wrong. I see you do the same with Floyd/Pac, you should own up to your losses more. I won't give you flack for complaining about the cunningham/glaskov fight becuase it truly was a close fight that could ahve gone either way, but Broner absolutely dismantled Molina. Molina is not on the same level, and Broner's speed just completely nullified anything Molina could ever do. If Broner slugged ito ut could Molian get him out? Absolutely, but if Broner moves, and boxes he wins 10/10.

Also it's not exactly a great prediction if you predicted that he would KO him, he never had him in real danger though he did stun him with a good uppercut but nothing to even suggest that he'd get Porter out of there, and what really schooled Porter was the right hand.

 

Give Adrien his props he's willing to fight anyone. He's called out everyone. Lucas has ducked him. Marcos refuses the rematch.

Great fight! Adrien has better skills and will win.

 

Not that, the injury excuses. I've seen you make posts like, Floyd beat a one armed pac.

The molina that fought Bey was losing every round till the last second. Just because Broner didn't get sloppy, doesn't mean he fought a different Molina.

 

Can Broner handle Porter's pressure and head first style?

We're going to see just how much AB has improved. If he can time Porter like Brook was able to, he can win. If Porter is able to butt him a few times and frustrate Broner, he'll win.

The Maidana fight doesn't inspire confidence in Adrien winning this one.

 

when?

 

How do you know though? Is there x-ray proof, why did he check no on the questionnaire? Isn't it obvious that he just wants another rematch? For someone that's one armed he sure did raise both arms up with ease after the fight.
Why is there always an excuse when you get a pick wrong in a clear fight? I'm guilty like you for calling close fights robberies so I won't even go there, but besides Porter/Brook I don't constantly make excuses for a pick I made. Just in the last 2 months, from what I remember there might even be more you picked MOlina to kill Broner, and after you said he was paid off, and for Pac/Floyd you picked Pac and now Pac is one armed.

 

Of course it is, because you picked Pac. How do we even know what this surgery was for, or how extensive it was? You're just speculating that Pac was one armed, and taking the worse case scenario. I despise Paulie since he's 2 faced, but he said it best, you cant fight like Pac did with a torn rotator cuff. He might have had an injured shoulder, but Floyd was suffering was injures too. Floyd has no hands they get injured in every fight, everyone knows that, but you dont hear people say Floyd beat Pac with no hands.

 

You weren't the only one claiming it so it's hard to tell if you're serious or not.

 

It's hard to tell though lol, you act like it's obvious that you were joking. Anyways, if Broner wins I hope you can eat your crow, like I will if Porter wins without any excuses. You'll probably say Porter lost because he didn't show up, or the Porter that fought Diaz showed up .

 

nowone really thinks that makin 144 for porter will be a problem? i see that effecting him negatively.