The official Mayweather vs. Pacquiao aftermath trash receptacle

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Mar 20, 2013.


  1. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    :|118-110
     
  2. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super Oneā„¢ banned

    48,579
    87
    Apr 18, 2013

    Porter & Broner? :lol::lol:

    This thread is about Mayweather & Pacquiao isn't it?

    But seen as you asked- I don't rate either fighter, especially now both have been stripped of their souls. And I don't like either overhyped PED cheat, so a double KO would be extremely satisfactory.

    You seem to have some sort of impression that I rate Brook's win over Porter like it's a win over a pound for pounder. It's not. Brook easily beat Porter on PEDs in his back yard without needing to get out of 2nd gear. And I've told you multiple times you only see Porter as Brook's best opponent because you are easily influenced by the lines HBO and Showtime feed you- he's not. Frankie Gavin is a better opponent than Porter. As was Jackiweiz. And Senchenko & Carson Jones (on the run of his career at the time) are on a similar level.

    The only thing Porter has going for him is a decent chin and brute strength- go check my posts from a year ago- see if I rated Porter any higher before Brook schooled him.

    However if it is a legitimate fight (which with Haymon's involvement in a Broner fight I have suspicions ) then Porter does pretty much what Maidana did to Broner- drained at catch-weight or not. Because as bad as Porter is, Broner is also totally ****.
     
  3. ryan_c

    ryan_c Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    30
    Oct 6, 2007
    This content is protected


    Master! Parry the left jab of the opponent then counter it by your left straight.
    http://ultraimg.com/images/R4Slowmo.gif

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  4. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    :|118-110
     
  5. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,053
    15,754
    Jul 25, 2014
    Good to see that you actually had the ***** to make a pick. lol @ Senchenko the guy who got stopped by Pauloie and Frankie the bum Gavin better than Porter but I won't even get into that.
    You better eat your crow if Broner wins.
     
  6. antonio plaisir

    antonio plaisir the detonator Full Member

    7,061
    3
    Nov 30, 2012
    on here it's just about whenever froch is mentioned. given the respective focus on each man (floyd is the much bigger name), i'd say there's inordinate focus on froch dirrell.
     
  7. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,053
    15,754
    Jul 25, 2014
    I rarely see it though, honestly. I've made a thread about it, but it didnt even get much notice, no one cared. Majority had Dirrell winning, but again the numbers were little. Make a mayweahter/castillo poll trust me it'll be one of the most popular posts on this forum even though it's been made a million times. Of course Floyd is the way bigger name, but people generally don't seem to give a **** about the Froch/Dirrell fight.
     
  8. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,510
    8,651
    Apr 25, 2008
    The Daily Mail is arguably the worst paper in the world so it probably is not best to use that rag as a source for the point you are trying to make.

    If you score a fight as the guy who walks forward more as the winner, then yes, Pacquiao won. However, if you score a fight properly, Mayweather wins.

    Floyd landed the most punchers and his superior defence and ring generalship made Pacquiaos aggression largely ineffective.

    Floyd also completely controlled the pace of the fight.

    I know Floyd's tactics made the fight boring for many, but, what you have to remember is that entertainment value should never have any effect on how you score a fight. You score a fight on the abilities both boxers show in the ring. You don't score for who entertains you more.
     
  9. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Because you have to be an utter ****ing idiot to think Pacquaio had any business winning the fight. Sorry, but you don't know how the **** to score a boxing fight and the Daily Mail isn't any better.
     
  10. Lady Girl

    Lady Girl Kneel Before Zod! Full Member

    31,836
    2,058
    Nov 2, 2013
  11. GOW7

    GOW7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,285
    5
    Aug 16, 2010
    http://fb.me/8nLnmReH8
     
  12. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Pretty much with the exception of maybe Holyfield - every high profile boxer, boxing ****yst and journalist have all come out almost unanimous saying that not only did Floyd win, he put on a boxing clinic and completely nullified anything Pacquaio could do.

    Even Kellerman, a Pacquaio fan normally, in his post fight interview, showed you how ludicrous he felt it was that Pacquaio claimed he won the fight.

    The ****ing English, so ****ing stupid.
     
  13. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    I should have been more specific. I was talking about people who weren't watching their first ever boxing match on May 2nd.
     
  14. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,868
    34,855
    Jun 23, 2005
    :deal
     
  15. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    2009 Pacquiao would've knocked out Mayweather... The same Pacquiao that got schooled by Marquez one year before lol