Pac was never a serious threat to floyd not even in 2009

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Eastpaw, May 7, 2015.


  1. Eastpaw

    Eastpaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,005
    163
    Apr 12, 2015
    you guys are idiots. those same counters that were there last week would have been there in 2009, pacquiao doesn't have that awkward bend your knee stutter step style that maidana has, he only has speed and angles. maidana gave floyd a better fight. floyd would have beaten pacquiao in any date anyone who's blind to that should pick another sport to watch because that's a very ****py opinion if you think otherwise. look what pac did to algieri, he steamrolled him...... he couldn't do any of that to floyd because he got countered almost everytime he extended. it wouldn't have been the same in 2009 with pacquiao's high pace. out of prime floyd beats a prime pacquiao. he is that good
     
  2. smooveonthe88

    smooveonthe88 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    11
    May 26, 2008
    He lost. No excuses. Keep it moving...:patsch
     
  3. smooveonthe88

    smooveonthe88 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    11
    May 26, 2008
    Floyd won.
     
  4. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    129
    Aug 13, 2009
    I'm calling it. Pac wins the rematch a year from now, it's a good story.
     
  5. wutang

    wutang Active Member Full Member

    1,295
    682
    Mar 10, 2012
    Are you serious? If pac wasn't a threat floyd wouldn't have fought cautiously.
     
  6. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,142
    5,637
    Nov 5, 2013
    What good story would that be?

    A fraud makes excuses after losing wide the first time, bull****s the fans and then lucky wins their 2nd time ? :think
     
  7. ryan_c

    ryan_c Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    30
    Oct 6, 2007
    Many thinks injured Pacquiao beat Floyd. If there is a rematch, Pacquiao would have a more convincing win against Floyd.
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,233
    36,483
    Jun 23, 2005
    I agree he got a lot of hype as the bogeyman who could bring PBF down. But if you looked at the fight realistically PBF would always have his way with him. Too flawed and limited fights at one range with no jab, that's not going to beat PBF he's too good.
     
  9. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    many = packroaches, your opinions are worth dudu

    118-110
     
  10. StreetsOfGold

    StreetsOfGold Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,252
    1
    Nov 9, 2008
    yea just like the undefeated fighters and champions at 135-140 were never a threat.Floyd doesn't need to fight prime champions he's way too good to have to face fighters like kostya Tszyu etc he i simply the best ever and doesn't have to have proved he is because he is tbe.

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  11. The_Ikon

    The_Ikon Active Member Full Member

    1,291
    1
    Sep 15, 2012
    This....
     
  12. Typhoon

    Typhoon Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    0
    Apr 19, 2014
    the fight was improperly scored, many have ****yzed it and agree that fight was very close.

    Without question, there was bias in scoring and commentating. This is what happens when you are the best, even with diminished skills and by doing little, everything is glorified. Some lf he stuff that came out of Lampley and Roy Jones Jr's mouths was some of the most exaggerated comments in recent memory. Floyd would throw jabs and not even hit Pac and they would claim it's 'masterful'; Floyd would throw a right hand and completely miss and they would say 'He's so accurate'; Floyd would run and hug and they would say 'His defense is best ever seen, he has control of the fight'. It was absolutely ridiculous but not unheard of...

    When Michael Jordan was old, commentators would go crazy when he did any little things 'this is greatness', 'what a move'... even if he was a shadow of his former self... same thing with Floyd.

    The fact of the matter is that Floyd Mayweather's performance against a somewhat injured Pacquiai was FAR FAR FAR from dominant. The punch stats have been carefully examined by experts and deemed to be false and inaccurate. Floyd threw more, Pacquiao landed more. Ontop of the inaccurate 'official' punch stats, commentating really was extremely biased. Watching the fight in mute is a completely different experience and this is why some at the fight think Pac won. When you are watching a fight and are constantly hearing commentators riding Mayweather's dck, you start believing it.

    The more i ****yze what actually happened, the more i'm thinking that a prime Pac beats prime Mayweather.
     
  13. nyboxingfan

    nyboxingfan Member Full Member

    250
    0
    Jun 17, 2011
    Pac was always a threat. That is why he waited this long to fight him and also wanted RDT for the first time in his career.
     
  14. Eastpaw

    Eastpaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,005
    163
    Apr 12, 2015
    Isn't floyd 3 years older than manny?
     
  15. icarus1

    icarus1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,574
    47
    Nov 27, 2010
    and floyd has to shame himself with all those videos just to avoid pac. truth is he fears pac but his fans thoughts are different. just because he won their fight doesn't mean all those actions in the past are not true.