The official Mayweather vs. Pacquiao aftermath trash receptacle

what are these scores?

 

It will be 45-4 once Khan gets his hands on him

 

You picked 2 other people who also beat him, great work genius atsch

The funny thing is the Floyd fans who hijacked this thread without any input to the topic of the thread, just spamming their blind unwavering belief that Floyd won and no matter what you prove, Floyd can't losenut

Thank you for the few people that actually watched the video and saw that Floyd lacked belief in himself and was missing due to Pacs superior ability.

 

Lying and making things up sounds the same to me. Sounds like either way you are accusing me of lying, which I am not. And that's not a particularly classy way to end a discussion.

I do not have a computer, I have my phone and I went on boxrec and checked his record to refresh my memory. It's harder to be thorough in my research this way which is why I asked you to do the research yourself but I am 100% confident in my statement that after losing to Spinks and Davis back to back Murray moved back down to MW and SMW for good (save for maybe 1 or 2 trips back up to LHW). He was predominantly a MW or SMW. If you go to any profile of him you will see him listed as a MW or SMW. I don't see how you think I'm the kind of person who can't admit to being wrong. The one instance where you corrected me on a fact (Chico beating Casamayor at 130) I immediately acknowledged the mistake. You, on the other hand, are yet to acknowledge that Murray Sutherland wasn't a drained LHW when he fought Hearns.

And what kind of person says, "You're the type that can't admit defeat". It's Mr. Strugg esque. We're having a conversation, not a war. Sure, we can agree to disagree, you just make it hard to part after a disagreement in an amicable way. And I'll happily make the poll when I get back to my computer. Should be in around 2 hours.

 

My honest opinion is that Canelo is underrated. I think that he has excellent skills as things stand and should only really be improving at the tender age of 24/25. He's probably only just entered his prime, but there are some serious serious players in and around his weight-class.

 

This content is protected

If ever there was a reason to justify a DQ when a trainer jumped into the ring, this was it...
He jumped in the ring and choked Zab Judah FFS atsch

 

Pacquia's right hands are always nonexistent for the most part. Why do you think it'd make a difference against Floyd?

Pacquiao's jab will never have an important factor in the fight. His right hook can only be landed in certain ranges. Ranges that Mayweather denied him all night. That right hand even at 100% health would have made the same result. 118-110

 

:rofl

 

Only casuals who don't know sh*t about boxing watch fights with the sound on, without slow-motion, without playing it in reverse, without 3D glasses or without watching it upside-down with sepia filter on.

Manny is definitely the undefeated P4P catchweight king of slow-motion fights. FACT FACT FACT FACT FACT FACT FACT FACT FACT FACT FACT

 

You claimed that you couldn't do research because you don't have a computer. The only conclusions I could come up with is that you're either a. lying, or b. making up numbers. What other conclusions could I have come up with? When i say you can't admit defeat, I'm saying you can't lose an argument, no we're not at war, but even if you're wrong you seem like the type that will just keep going at it. Don't bother making a thread for my sake, make it for yourself if you want, I really can't be bothered arguing with you anymore. I feel like I completely shut your argument down, you brought up Corrales, Floyd, Pac as exampels to your argument and I proved you wrong, you couldn't even name a couple of guys that can compare to his 154 resume. Anyways that's how I took it, I'm sure you think differently. Take it easy man.

 

Pac is spot on, it's been proven over and over now too.

 

I gave you the rule. You asked how that could happen and I gave you the rule. If you think the just decision in that scenario in that situation would have been to DQ Mayweather then that's fine. However, if you're going ask why he didn't get DQ'd then don't get salty when the rule is explained to you.

 

Stay classy.

 

Canelo is good but his problem is speed. He may be more technical and powerful than let's say Pacquiao but i wouldn't be shocked if Pac beats him easily.

I wasn't impressed with his Kirkland performance that much because Kirkland fought like a brawling savage... with no regard for defense. Canelo did well to avoid getting ko'd but Kirk was easy to hit...

Canelo looked horrible vs Floyd and not good vs Lara. His win over trout was controversial. I think he's one of the best but i question is raw abilities to match guys like Pac or Floyd.

 

I honestly can't tell if most of these guys are trolling. They very well could be. Then again, people believe some crazy stuff.