Tyson vs Holmes discussion

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by heizenberg, May 21, 2015.


  1. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    Tyson's fight in 1988 with an old Larry Holmes has always been a very interesting fight to me, I feel people don't give Tyson's the credit he deserves for that win. I'll be the first to tell you Tyson's receives more credit then he deserves for his career and accomplishments. This is not saying Tyson is a bad fighter or not a great fighter he just isn't the greatest fighter who ever lived like a lot of people try to make him out to be. But in his fight with an old but still very crafty and determined Larry Holmes was a master piece.

    Larry Holmes on the other hand is the opposite of Tyson, he receives way less credit then he deserves. You know how many people I met that like me studied old boxing film and have never taken the time to check out Larry Holmes... Larry Holmes if you ask me is without a doubt a top 5 heavyweight IMO top 3... When he faced Tyson his glory days were passed but he still had his greatness in the ring with him... When Holmes was beat by Spinks the first time I feel it was a matter of Holmes taking Spinks lightly. Holmes had tremendous confidence and it seemed that he had taken a few opponents lightly towards the end of his title reign and got away with it. I feel he felt cause Spinks was a light heavyweight coming up he had no chance.. Holmes was wrong, Spinks a great fighter and competitor out hustled Holmes... The second fight Holmes was ****ed and came in ready.. I felt he pretty much beat up Spinks and won the fight.. Spinks being a master boxer made it close by out hustlin Holmes in some rounds and fighting very hard but still I feel Holmes deserved the win he didn't get it.... I know this was a huge blow for Holmes who clearly was very bothered about the lack of credit he received throughout his career. I'm sure when he made the comeback to fight Tyson he made sure to be as ready as he could be. It would've been wise to take a couple tune ups but Holmes is a master boxer I feel he was sharp on the night he faced Tyson and was looking to add too his legacy...

    In the fight Holmes used his great defense to try and keep Tyson at range. Holmes rolled with Tyson's punches and clinched. Used his jab and looked to catch Tyson coming in with both straight right hands and uppercuts to the head and body. Holmes also side stepped well looking to keep Tyson off balance... Tyson kept constant pressure... He moved his head very well and though on the attack the entire time was patient setting up his punches which he usually tried to follow up on in combination to both the body and head... Tyson hand and footspeed looked tremendous he also changed angles well and dodged many well timed right hands from Holmes and slipped the jab throughout... In the 4th round Holmes looked to turn it up.. He got on his toes and tried to go on the attack but Tyson completely took the play away from him... Tyson nailed him with big punches to the body and head then floored him an excellent fast overhand right.... Holmes who was very crafty and had great re-cooperative abilities tried to fend off Tyson and survive but couldn't. Tyson unleashed one the most fierce attacks I can recall finishing off in knocking Holmes cold with a right hand...

    Too me this is Tyson best and most complete performance. Now I know some people will say so what he beat a once great fighter... Larry Holmes was still great at this time.. He wasn't at his best but he still had great craft in the ring and was a master boxer. I wouldn't bet on anyone else to beat Larry Holmes in the fashion Tyson did even on that given night. 4 Years later Holmes would launch a very good comeback... He'd give Ray Mercer his first lose in an extremely impressive showing.. Ray Mercer was no joke and Holmes didn't beat the out of shape unmotivated Ray Mercer who lost to Jesse Ferguson.. Holmes beat Ray Mercer who was ready and had just destroyed Tommy Morrison. Mercer brought it the entire fight and Holmes handled him with his defense.... After that he gave Evander Holyfield in his prime a lot of trouble. He'd go on to challenge years after again for the title and lose a close decision to Oliver McCall...He continued fighting for many more years and no one was ever able to come close to doing what Tyson did to him on that night when he was 38 and in shape... Gotta give it up to Tyson for that performance. Holmes was one of the most defensively skilled heavyweights ever and only a special fighter could take him out in the early rounds like Tyson did even at that time.
     
  2. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,394
    8,826
    Oct 8, 2013
  3. Savak

    Savak Guest

    People accusing and mocking Tyson for failing to beat a great boxer in his career. Here is one. Larry was boasting and commenting about the fact that his lay off was going to benefit him as it allowed him to get some much needed rest from so many fights in his career. He was planning to beat Mike Tyson and had gone into the fight with a plan.

    After he got so comprehensively beaten, he started making excuses about the lay off and the lack of Tune up fights but the reality is he just came across the best version of Tyson who would be very hard to beat for most all time greats at that phase of his career.

    Holmes had tremendous heart, great chin and amazing recovering abilities if in case anything went wrong in a fight but that night he just had no answers and that is just the straight forward reality.

    To bad Tyson squandered his talent and ability to become the GOAT.
     
  4. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    Well said.. Tyson could've potentially become the greatest of all time had he kept his head in the right place and continued the path he was on but I'm not certain that even if he did he would've reigned supreme over Lennox, Bowe or Holyfield, its very possible he would've but no sure thing....
     
  5. Savak

    Savak Guest

    Bowe and Lewis i think he would have prevailed. Bowe just got hit too much, his defense was sloppy and his training habits were horrible, he would Tyson a tough fight in the first few rounds but i back Tyson to take his best shots and eventually Tyson because he lands more and more power shots just prevails, Bowe is very easy to floor, Holyfield gave him a tough time and Tyson hits even harder.

    A prime Lewis Tyson fight can either be a UD victory for Tyson just like Tucker, Green but Lenni's weak chin can also lead to a possibility of a KO victory for Tyson. If the absolute worst version of Tyson who was not even 1% of what he used to be can survive almost 9 rounds of murder by the best version of Lewis, then you can sure bet its not going to be easy at all for Lewi against the best version of Tyson from 1985-88. Lewi never faced some like Tyson from 1985-88. Tyson had faster hands, equal power, fast feet, the ability to deliver fast furious combinations, he just needs one punch to the chin while Lewi needed 167 punches before knocking him out (where he also pushed him down as well).

    Holyfield is the only one i back to win over the Tyson of 1985-88. I personally believe Holyfield intimidated Tyson with his warrior like energy, just never gave up, kept on coming back. He fought the bravest fight against Tyson on the inside, took his best shots, he himself has a warrior chin. A 1985-88 Tyson will put up a better showing but i suspect will suffer a UD defeat.
     
  6. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,666
    2,148
    Aug 26, 2004
    I also think Tyson could have had a much better finish had Cus been around simply because Cus could keep him grounded, Tyson should have easily gotten past Buster and kept it going without all of the outside drama. King was part of his ruination and Givens didn't help and it was bad choice after bad choice

    That being said I think Tyson would always beat Holmes it was styles. Holmes did not always fight the best available and navigated around the most potentially dangerous guys. Tyson came into the picture and dominated the guys that were struggling with one another including Larry Holmes and his opponents and some of Larry's avoidance's -Thomas, Berbick,M.Spinks-Tubbs-Williams were dispatched and Bonecrusher was the clutcher to only survive ...Tyson showed them all how its done and took Larry out emphatically, call him old if you want...but I dont see a prime Larry lasting much longer in fact he may have tried to mix earlier and went out earlier...Tyson was a finisher once he had (unlike Shavers and Snipes) you hurt for the most part and he was the best fighter that Larry had ever faced
     
  7. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    This overwhelming love fest for Tyson is all very well if you like your bullsh it to come in waves, but in the real world it is simply that. BULLSH IT.

    All you fan boys do realise that Holmes hadn't been in a competitive ring for 21 months prior to the Tyson fight?

    It is bad enough if a 28 year old is out for that long, never mind a 38 year old.
     
  8. FreshPrince

    FreshPrince Member Full Member

    146
    13
    May 12, 2015
    Good posts. I've also thought that the Holmes that Tyson fought was no joke at all. Imo, Holmes very well might be the third greatest heavyweight of all-time, and I see him, among very few others, who actually has a good chance of beating a "prime" Ali. Like with Charles (and Louis), Holmes unfortunately continues to be overshadowed by a more popular previous champ in Ali. And it's a damn shame.
     
  9. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    Some very interesting points here, especially the end, I believe Tyson on that night was the best fighter Holmes ever did face. I still wouldn't count Holmes out in his prime..
     
  10. Savak

    Savak Guest

    You are a hypocrite and nothing else, take your Lenni Chinny cant take a punch to the face Lewi nut hugging somewhere else and stay out of the Tyson threads.

    You are willing to use Holmes inactivity for 2 years as excuse for his loss to Tyson but are not willing to acknowledge the impact of Tyson's 4 years of incarceration with no access to a boxing gym and training facilities for his decline?
     
  11. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Of course the lay off took something out of him but he wasn't exactly looking stellar before his arrest was he?? He struggled badly in the 2nd Ruddock bout and almost certainly dodged some defeats by going to prison.
     
  12. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,576
    Nov 24, 2005
    Tyson's performance cannot be faulted.

    I'm not sure where this idea that Holmes was "still great" is coming from though.
    38 years old, coming off a 21-month lay-off, weighed in heavier than he ever had before, and he had looked like a washed-up fighter in his fights BEFORE that lay-off too.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  13. Ragamuffin

    Ragamuffin Active Member Full Member

    1,194
    239
    Apr 24, 2015
    The first time I ever saw Larry Holmes was when he beat Earnie Shavers, and if I remember had him down on one knee in one of the later rounds. The next time I saw Larry, was the epic title fight with Ken Norton in 1978. I always admired Holmes for his efforts in the ring and the way he dispatched many of his opponents. However, styles make fights as we all know, and I am convinced that any age Holmes would not have beaten Mike on the night they fought. Larry always kept his left hand a bit on the low side, making defence from an opponents right a bit limited. A habit of a lifetime which could never be changed. I firmly believe a prime Mike Tyson would KO a prime Larry Holmes fairly quickly. As I said, styles make fights. Although I would not say I was a Tyson fan of any degree, every time I see one of the interviews where Holmes denigrates other pro fighters such as Marciano, Foreman and Spinks, I go back and watch the Tyson-Holmes bout on youtube. Larry is a bitter, bitter ex-boxer.
     
  14. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,100
    8,534
    Jul 17, 2009

    Tyson was indeed in good form that night but Holmes was 38 years old and rusty as hell,imo.
     
  15. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,100
    8,534
    Jul 17, 2009

    Thing is,Lewis was also past his best when he fought Tyson. Just not as past it as Tyson.

    Lennox was at his very top form around 1997,I think.