Who would do better against the 200lb + Heavyweights post 1960 R Marciano or A Moore

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, May 20, 2015.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    The only fly in the ointment here is that the best heavyweights that Rocky kod were not prime.
     
  2. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,408
    Jul 15, 2008
    The whole round and round is based on one simple fact and that is hardcore Rocky guys refuse to accept his accomplishments in perspective to realities .. age and wear and tear of opposition does not matter, not just one fighter but opposition as a whole, all had one more great fight left in them and Rocky destroyed what was left, beating up light heavyweights and small cruiser weights does not matter, it goes on and on and it is silly. The man should be gaged on the significant accomplishments and off a mythological pedestal .. any other way of looking at him or those who support him tribally opposed to objectively is not to be taken seriously ..
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,221
    Feb 15, 2006
    I won't lie to you, I tend to be much more interested in where a fighters opponents were rated in the division, than how old/big they were.

    It might be surprising that they were rated where they were, in some cases.
     
  4. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,640
    18,437
    Jun 25, 2014
    As opposed to a "prime" Bob Baker?

    :roll:

    Marciano beat all-time great heavyweights (regardless). Moore did not.

    If you can knock out Louis, Charles and Walcott, you'll do fine against Folley, Machen, Patterson, Ellis, Quarry, Spencer, Martin, Chuvalo, Williams ... styles be damned.

    I'd take Ali and Liston to beat him straight up.
     
  5. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Yeah, provided ALL of them were at least 38 years old or Light Heavies at the time of fighting.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    Where they were rated is dependant on who was about don't you think? ie How deep was the quality at the time? When I see men 40 + rated in a division I think it isn't very deep. Tony Thompson is a case in point.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    I don't accept that any of the heavyweights
    Marciano beat were great when he beat them .
    I'll go further, I firmly believe that of Marciano's opponents only Joe Louis was a great heavyweight and that when he met Rocky he was well past his best, and therefore no longer great
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    So Foreman and Holmes in the top ten at age 45 means the 1990s wasn't very deep?
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Funny how Moore has enough legs and stamina to knockout hall of Famer in his prime Harold Johnson in round 14 at age 37...but one year later his legs and stamina " gives out" in round 6 against rocky Marciano.


    Just admit it McVea...Marciano beat the bag out of moore that's why Archie got tired. No other reason. Archie always had great stamina young or old.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    Holmes was only momentarily rated in the 90's.
    How many past prime light heavyweights were rated in the 90's
     
  11. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,640
    18,437
    Jun 25, 2014
    Archie Moore got knocked out by every heavyweight champ he fought.

    Rocky Marciano knocked out every heavyweight champ he fought ... in addition to knocking out Archie Moore.

    Archie Moore couldn't beat a past, current or future heavyweight champ AND Archie Moore couldn't beat Marciano.

    There is absolutely no basis to claim Moore would do better in the 1960s against other top heavyweights than Marciano, because Moore didn't do better than Marciano against heavyweights in the 1950s.

    Marciano beat better heavyweights in the 1950s and he was undefeated against them.

    Marciano would do better against the 60s heavyweights than Moore because Marciano was a better heavyweight than Moore AND he was better than Moore. He proved it in the ring.
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Holmes beat the undefeated who heavyweight champion. He got a world title shot because of it. Momentarily or not he was still rated which debunks your argument

    Moore was 45-1 in his last 46 fights with multiple wins over prime hall of famers and 210lb top heavyweight contenders going into the Marciano fight for crying out loud. When was Moore ever fighting better than that in his career?

    Would you say Hopkins was past his prime when he fought Trinidad in 2001?
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    McVey

    Please list all of the heavyweight champions who beat heavyweights who were great at the time they faced them?
     
  14. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    More importantly list all the assets you think Marciano has to beat, Liston, Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Holmes, Tyson, Holyfield, Lewis, or either Klitchko.

    Because out of those 10 I see at least nine of them totally destroying the stumpy little slugger inside 8 rounds, with the other 1 scoring a complete shut out.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    You believe what you want.I'll believe what I watch.:good