The official Mayweather vs. Pacquiao aftermath trash receptacle

Floyd's last KO's were a guy with his hands down and a British cokehead.

 

Longest reigning champion in history. Longer than Joe Louis. Keep crying.


Name me another boxer in the entire history of the sport that was recognized as the #1 guy, in 2 divisions at the same time, at the age of 38? You won't find one.

 

Has anybody pointed out how dumb it is to write an open letter to a man who can't even read?

 

Floyd is exciting in his own way. The way he demoralizes fighters in and outside of the ring is very entertaining, imo.

 

Has anybody pointed out how stupid a person must be, to say somebody can't read, when they clearly can? It's not even a good joke. Just shows you're an ignorant person who hates somebody who doesn't know you exist. It's sad and pathetic.

Grow up clown. You're not even good at being a smart ass.

 

Once your fans dry out, then so do you. Fight of the century? That wasnt even fight of the week. Like i said before, move it over to espn or spike tv. Bye bye.

 

Who cares about that nonsense? 154 is extremely weak, and we all know that Lara, Andrade, and maybe even Trout would beat Floyd.

He most certainly isn't longer reigning than Louis..Louis was the lineal champion of his division for x amount of time/defense....Floyd hasn't come close to that in any division.

Being a champ these days is not the same as being THE champ.

 

Is he actually blaming Manny for a bad fight? Hahaha. It's like everyone knows Floyd ain't going to do **** so it's always up to the other guy to do something. :roflatsch

Funny how Floyd's fight sell a lot, but if you actually ask most people if they liked the fight, they say "no" or "it was alright". Seems like people get more caught up in the whole "spectacle" of the event rather than the fight itself. It's clear from the crowds that there's very little excitement in the fights. And whenever there is, is because the other guy pushes Floyd.

 

Nobody asked for your pathetic excuses to the answers to your original question. What a surprise, you don't like the answers given. What a shock! (not)

You're a loser dude. Only loser's hate on other men's accomplishments. That's a fact of life pal.

 

What's weak is Pac's "eighth title" at 154 in a catchweight fight with Margarito when neither one of them was ranked at 154. That's weak.

 

EVERYBODY beats Floyd then the excuses fly when Floyd beats them. Mosley was supposed to be Floyd's boogeyman. Then Canelo. Then Balcquiao. Now it's Trout :rofl:rofl

 

130: Never beat Freitas or Casamayor.
135: Never beat Spadafora or Dorin.
140: Never beat Tszyu, Cotto, or Hatton.
147: Never beat Margarito, Williams, or Pacquiao in his prime.
154: Never beat Lara, Trout, or Andrade.

He's made a career out of being one of the best in each division he fights in without ever proving that he's THE best the division.

 

It's really kind of sad that this kind of stuff is so important to them.

 

You sound mad as hell. Looks like the joke worked. :|:yep

 

I don't recognize Pacquiao's eight titles as any kind of accomplishment.

Time was when there were only eight divisions and eight titles. I don't count 'titles' toward calculations of greatness unless it's a lineal title. That's the only way to stack up today's boxers against those of the former era.