Larry Holmes vs Jack Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, May 22, 2015.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Holmes would school Dempsey pretty easily and probably stop him around the mid rounds if not early
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,220
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think Holmes could give Dempsey a lot of problems, but I suspect that Jack would get to him eventually.
     
  4. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    :goodmy thoughts
     
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,410
    Jul 15, 2008
    I think it is a very interesting fight .. Dmpsey's speed and power would make him very dangerous .. based n what I have seen of both I have to go with Larry decisioning him but this is where not knowing how gray Dempsey might have been hurts his legacy to me ..
     
  6. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    Holmes is a stayer -- exactly the kind of fighter you want against a banger. He could have some shaky moments but he'll be there at the end and he'll be ahead on points.

    Man, if that Shavers punch didn't knock him out Dempsey wont either.

    Granted, Dempsey is a better finisher, but that was the best punch Shavers had.
     
  7. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
  8. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,587
    2,493
    Nov 6, 2011
    Stylistically this should favour Dempsey. Larry is a very good puncher, he's a very good boxer as well, but his work when he is being backed up leaves a little to be desired. Jack won't give him time to get himself set, which is why people should think twice about picking Larry here. Demspey by late stoppage is my choice, failing that Holmes with a close one on the cards.
     
  9. andy

    andy Member Full Member

    132
    15
    Oct 3, 2007
    Nobody knows, this is the correct answer.
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,577
    27,220
    Feb 15, 2006
    Always!
     
  11. SILVER SKULL 66

    SILVER SKULL 66 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,714
    47
    Oct 6, 2013
    Ditto well put...
     
  12. big_AL

    big_AL P4P #1 Full Member

    2,410
    59
    Jul 22, 2010
    Holmes has every conceivable advantage it seems bar Power but none of those advantages were particularly good enough to ever right off a decent opponent (except his jab of course)

    I could see this easily being a close, rough affair but my head says it ends up being a comfortable decision for Holmes

    world class jab plus size advantage= 90% chance of victory, 10 % just don't get KO'd
     
  13. FreshPrince

    FreshPrince Member Full Member

    146
    13
    May 12, 2015
    These are pretty much my thoughts. Holmes is NOT getting KO'd. Holmes is too stubborn and skilled to get KO'd. If someone is beating Dempsey, it's Holmes and a few others.
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,540
    46,109
    Feb 11, 2005
    I suspect you don't really understand how good Holmes was and how untested Dempsey was allowed to be.
     
  15. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004

    Holmes skipped a lot more test than Dempsey did and even though it was different day Dempsey fought who they put in front of him and even when his legs were done he dropped Tunney for the long count and took out Sharkey.....an active Dempsey would have had more of a resume but he was the most dangerous heavyweight of the day and until Joe Louis