Joe Calzaghe retired 46-0 (32) in 2008. Get over it. Fans & haters; quit trolling!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Jun 24, 2013.


  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010
    joe wasn't ever going to rematch Mitchell once he realised that Mitchell wasn't shot.
     
  2. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010
    thejoe fooled us allby playing us both and then spending the money on his coke habit.
     
  3. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    I don't.

    Completely irrelevant to Calzaghe vs Kessler and Froch vs Kessler which is what we were discussing.

    You are a liar. Calzaghe landed a bunch of good shots and hurt Mitchell (the final one being a cuffing left hand which hits the top of Mitchell's head/temple area). Mitchell could barely stand up which prompted the ref to stop the fight.
     
  4. mrdoctor

    mrdoctor GGG Full Member

    6,775
    14
    Jun 22, 2010
    Wasn't joe around with the WBO belt when it wasn't reconized?carls wins are much more deeper..and joe is a boring fighter..and tell me if I'm wrong but carl made heaps more than joe..i hope we get to see GGG vs froch..it will be a super fight for sure.
     
  5. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,864
    Apr 19, 2010
    im afraid that ^ is the reality of it
     
  6. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010
    we are discussing location being important. now you've been given evidence you are running away from that argument.

    fair enough. but admit when you are running.



    Mitchell could barely stand up? the ref waved the fight off before Mitchell has slipped to the floor! - that ref NEVER even stopped to check if Mitchell could stand, he was too busy trying to dive between them to call the fight off and save joe.

    buti notice that ref gave calzaghe a full counts rest when he just got floored minutes earlier.
     
  7. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,864
    Apr 19, 2010
    you just cant see that with them joetinted glasses on
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010
    yeah and gneus thinks location means nothing.

    outside Cardiff that would have been the end of joes reign of even the minor wbo title. And not for the last time either.

    note that joe was straight back to fighting subnational and/or eurobums straight after that fiasco. it took him another 3 years to summon the guts to invite an American to Cardiff again, and even then he chose the duffest one possible jeff lacy.
     
  9. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    What evidence? You have given no evidence of location being important and no evidence that Kessler would have beaten Calzaghe in a different location. Seems you are the one running and changing the subject. The original subject was you claiming Calzaghe vs Kessler might have produces a different outcome in a different location.


    He was struggling to stand up. He wobbled around a lot and then fell into the ropes.
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010
    ok, a ref carrying a home fighter back to his corner is not evidence in gneusland. but we do not live in your country of Gneusdom, my friend.




    how can you be struggling to stand up if you are on your feet?

    "to stand up" implies you aren't standing,. he was.

    and yes he slipped for a microsecond sideways whilst not being hit, didn't fall to the floor, and was vertical again - but in that microsecond the ref had called it off as a tko!

    and you are still arguing about location not being important after me writing that! ha!
     
  11. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,864
    Apr 19, 2010
    location means nothing yet joe who is english lived in wales pretended to be the self professed welsh man so much so he as a welsh flag on his shorts selling to the welsh crowds of cardiff , but then in the next breath he is english born in hammersmith fights on away soil in cardiff you see its win win for joe and failey and super hands :oops:
    or he fought in england making the adopted welsh lad still fighting away from his adopted home land

    morons will argue till the sheep come home
     
  12. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010
    failey is still cutting and pasting this logic that failed years ago.

    yet he wonders why everyone refers to him as failey.
     
  13. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    It's not evidence of location being important or of Kessler being able to beat Calzaghe in a different location. The ref "carrying" Cleverly didn't impact on the result did it genius? Even if it had (which it didn't) it would only be evidence of ref being important, not of location being important. A fair ref can ref things fairly in any location. A corrupt, poor or biased ref can be that way in any location.


    1. ISTR the ropes stopping him from falling.

    2. Struggling to do something and being unable to do something are not the same. You might want to look up the word "struggle" in a dictionary.
     
  14. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,864
    Apr 19, 2010
    you mean like george groves in the first fight with froch :think :rofl
     
  15. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    Yes why?