Joe Calzaghe retired 46-0 (32) in 2008. Get over it. Fans & haters; quit trolling!

Well, it's a little better than crying like a school girl after beating a Shot Gatti.

 

Lacy was on the road of greatness. Calzaghe ruined him. Period

 

Calzaghe was better than Froch but I think Calzaghe is now envy of Froch. Not because of his resume, because Calzaghe had a better resume, but because Froch is selling out Arena's, he's being talked about whilst Cazlaghe is doing what? Froch is in the limelight and Calzaghe is using Froch's name to try and be relevant when really the only way Calzaghe would be relevant right now is if he fought Froch, which he's not going to do.

 

clearly the ref was trying to save clev and get him in shape to fight on.

it was cheating, you know it, everyone knows it, just like everyone knows location has a little bearing on fights.

everyone but you.

how do you know? he staggered (without being hit) and then was straight up again. But it was no use that e was, since the ref had already called it off without even checking.

"stand up" is in the dictionary too
dictionary quote - " To rise to an upright position on the feet."

you destroy your own arguments, this is too easy! that's a pretty huge fail by you.

 

Trash talking's the one area Froch would absolutely take Zaggers to school

 

Irrelevant. It's not location and it didn't help him at all anyway.

How does it?

Because I saw him stumble around for a while and then fall into the ropes.

Which is what Mitchell was struggling to do.

Are you high? Mitchell was struggling to stand up. He just about managed to stay standing with the help of the ropes. :hi:

 

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...backing-George-Groves-to-beat-Carl-Froch.html

he picked groves.

 

Carl has a better resume and Calzaghe ducked him. He is extremely bitter and has been since the Bute fight.

 

Read my links.

For the second fight, he indeed picked Groves, with reservations about his stamina.

Remember that just about anybody in England was picking him too after the bogus stoppage of the first encounter.

Carl was seen as shot; Hamed even suggested the BBC should have revoked his licence for his own good.

 

Fixed.

 

Joes entire resume is Hopkins and Kessler. Everyone else was either completely shot or not that good.

Kessler was taking his first step up in class and injured.

Bhop was 43 and a career mw

 

Zaggers better H2H

Froch far better resume

Thats my 2c

 

Whatever.

Carl will lose his next fight, probably with Degale, and the score will be settled as who was better, or who ducked who.

 

Froch: Abraham, Pascal, Bute, Groves, Taylor (Kessler: debatable in my view)

Joe: Eubank, Lacy, Kessler ( clear win), Hopkins, Jones Jr

Just the Eubank win alone is better than any Froch victory.
And he never lost.

 

nope its you being a sore loser.


changing things by fakery, very cowardzaghe.