Is Kell Brook the only #1 rated boxer in his division tha fights guys who arent top10

he is the senchenko of the uk

brook is a protected fighter and he keeps fighting bums.......the biggest fight of his career will be against a walking punching bag in brandon rios if it ever comes off and brook doesn't fake an injury

 

I'd like to see Brook vs Maidana but I doubt Brook fights him.

 

Dan was a mando, but you already know that. Please think before typing in future. Gavin isn't the best opponent, but you whine that much about Brook that you surely already knew Dan was a mando? If not you really need to step up your obsession, you're slipping.

 

Hans hands ellerbe his Ass once again, nothing too see here.

 

You thought Brook wouldn't take the Porter fight, then you thought he was going to lost the Porter fight. He proves you wrong on both counts, gets stabbed and starts to make a comeback and you're still on his back. How many times do you need to be proven wrong before you pipe down.

 

Either your English is appalling or you are a simpleton. As you clearly stated that Gavin fought Bundu, who was Thurman's leftovers. Do you understand that any reasonable person would read that as Gavin fought Bundu AFTER Thurman did? Alvarado is really not that good, and your disturbing habit of completely ignoring official results, simply to bolster your weak argument is quite frankly pathetic. As for Acosta, Peterson and Antillion, they were decent lightweights when Rios fought tgem years ago. Christ, if we want to go that far back Gavin was a world champion amateur. Btw I never said that Gavin had a better resume than Rios, so stop inventing points so you can enhance your argument. I said that Rios is grossly overrated and I stand by that. And Collazo did better against Hatton nine years ago than Gavin did against Bundu? So what? Tony Sibson beat Alan Minter as quickly as Hagler did!! See how irrelevant all those are? You're a moron, who lives in a dream world, where your obtuse opinion is all that matters and your steadfast refusal to consider official records and other opinions is both worrying and pitiful. You're an obvious Brook hater and as such are entitled to every word of ridicule that you receive. I have no doubt that you slated Collazo as a choice of opponent for Amir last year, but now think its okay fir Thurman to fight him? What if Thurman doesn't stop Luis (who Amir dropped three times ) , like he was unable to stop Bundu and Guerrero? Start a thread on Thurman and his shameful choice of opponent and I will happily revise my low opinion of you.

 

Yer he fought the IBF intercontinental to get that ball rolling 9 months before Brook even fought Porter, so you can throw your pay off conspiracy theory out the window . F.uck me, if people did only so much as a tiny bit of research they'd realise how stupid they look when they type. It's not Brooks fault the IBF sometimes have **** rankings. I mean they have Glazkov at No1 at Heavy, is Wlad paying them off for an easy mando? And obviously Kovalev has paid them the big bucks to get Mohammedi rated No1 at LHW? Gilberto Ramirez is ranked No3 at 168, is that another long term plan from Eddie Hearn? They even have Cuenca & Yang at 1 and 2 at 140 with a vacant title. No ones paying anyone, their ranking system is just s.hit.

 

I'll get me coat.

 

To be honest mate, I'd duck a Skype with you. You often come across as a raving weirdo and a Skype with you would probably be like watching The Ring (Japanese weird sh it with a curse attached). And as for picking The Unbetweeners over Peep Show... I guess that makes you about 15. Btw 5000 Japanese yen is about £26. Your flash pad is probably a recycling bin.