Is Kell Brook the only #1 rated boxer in his division tha fights guys who arent top10

It was at 8 weeks notice, if you want to keep busy you're going to fight some **** as well. And that above post was for someone else who did post that pal. Kell is coming back from a career threatening injury, if he wants to keep busy to get him back to peak performance then so be it, he's fought 3 rounds since the Porter fight. Andre Ward is fighting Paul Smith, at a catchweight to boot and Ward isn't even coming back from injury!

 

It's not simple as I don't have access to retroactive rankings. I'm sure someone may know, I don't though, however if you look at their 140 rankings I'd say its highly likely.

 

Because a commission that ranks Cesar Cuenca & Ik Yang as its one and two is very likely to have had Blazer and Dan at 1 and 2 at 147. Would you not agree? They've still got Bizier in their top ten now ffs and Sadam Ali, whoever the hell he is.

 

More importantly, if that's true, he's actually gone up in their rankings following a loss? Like I said their rankings are s.hit, but it's not a payoff from Eddie Hearn, they kicked of their s.hit merry-go-round a full 8 or 9 months before Porter fought Brook, and most people thought Brook would lose. I would assume Bizier got the eliminator shot off the back of his SD loss to Dan previous.

 

:rofl

How on Earth could Frankie be fighting Thurman's leftovers BEFORE Keith?? Seriously, check a dictionary. Leftovers does not mean what you think. And since you also got "Slack" completely wrong you really ought to master English. I wilk agree that you did say that you have gave Thurman **** but I suggested that you start a thread to publicly do so, just as you have done Kell. And you wont. That's fair enough, but if you aren't willing to do so, then we are entitled to consider you a hypocrite who has an agenda (ie Brook hater).. And your admission that you slated Khan a year ago for fighting Collazo says it all. Did you start a thread slating Khan last year fir fighting Collazo? I bet you did, you greasy snake. But you won't do so when Thurman fights him? That says it all. And you know that I never in any way attempted to compare Frankie's amateur career to Rios's pro career. I simply made the point that Rios's best wins were years ago and if one went back way enough Gavin was a world champion amateur to try and illustrate just how stupid you were being... I guess you're even dumber than I thought (which is surprising since I consider you to be a moron ). And please, stop humiliating yourself by manipulating my words in an abject attempt to justify ridicule. It is pathetic. I have never once suggested that Gavin's resume was comparable to Rios's. I simply stated that I consider Rios to be grossly overrated and I stick by that.

 

It ****es me off that they aren't fighting each other.. Thurman Brook Khan Bradley... If they fought earlier then one of them would've been a good candidate for Floyd for september.

 

To be fair elle Hans comes across as a funny guy. Whereas you come across as a xenophobic (look it up, id hate for you to get it wrong) prat and a moron. So yes I do prefer to read his logical and amusing posts to your hate filled, irrational drivel, which ooze hypocrisy and nationalist bias.

 

Im just enjoying mocking you elle. I find it highly amusing. And you are incapable of embarrassing anyone other than yourself, due entirely to your patent (look it up) lack of intellect and insight (you alter fighters'records to confirm your point ). And the fact that you distort a persons posts in an abject attempt to claim some sort of hollow victory is hilarious.