I don't care where Desiree Washington went, at 18 years old she would have to be a fuking genius to out wit the police surgeon who examined her injuries.
Don't bother with your scabby bridge for sale. If you are stupid enough to believe Tyson was innocent, I'll GIVE you Windsor Castle. I don't care about half witted opinions, DNA and medical evidence don't lie. Ffs your silly actor, cum footballer geezer DID kill his wife and her boyfriend, and got a not guilty. You trying to tell me Tyson couldn't have got the same result, particularly if he was innocent? You best get back to window licking if you are that gullible. I suppose Teddy Atlas pulling a gun on the freak for interfering with his 11 year old relative was another case of the innocent Tyson being victimised was it?:nut
Lewis was in 100% prime against Rahman ,Tyson or Vitali. When was Lewis' prime by your opinion ? Against Bruno ? When Bruno outsmarted him and Lewis won by his typical lucky style. Against McCall? When Mccall destroyed him in the second round. Against Akinwande ? When practically the feateherfisted Akinwande knocked down Lewis.And lewis won by a lame dq. Against Mercer ? When the 42 years old Holmes victim the fat Mercer outjabbed him. Against Rahman ? When this bum knocked out Lewis by a classic one punch ko. Against Vitali ? When Vitali used Lewis like a punchin' bag.
I think lots of man say the boxing is more about the mental state but i don't know what's the reason of the lots of bulked body. I think this mental thing sounds well but this sport is based on physical factors this isn't a card game.
Lewis was offered 14 million in 96, the highest purse of his career at that point which he turned down..how is that ducking Lewis..the offer was on the table, he being the B fighter declined it, how is that Tyson ducking him Ill never know
Tyson deserved the title fight like McCall the Lewis rematch. Considering the prime McCall destroyed Lewis easily i can see bigger difference between the 88s Tyson and the Lewis version than in McCall's case. I think Lewis hadn't chance against the prime McCall (The history proved) obviously Lennox had zero chance against the prime Tyson who was far better than the Lewis beater McCall(His Holmes,Bruno fights proved.) I hope every Lewis fan can accept this otherwise they don't know the logic.
What i find really funny is that Lewis was hessitant to take out Mccall in their second fight even though he was a mental mess, a stationary target and standing in front of him? How on earth can Lewis even get credit for that victory is so bizzare.
More trolling from you. This article is just 2 days old. He is still trying to convince the public over the credibility of his major wins.
A fair degree of naiveté here. Nobody is disputing that rough intercourse took place. A forensic examination can not determine whether or not it was consensual. Your loathing of Tyson appears to have clouded your thinking skills here. As I told the other Tyson-hater, nobody knows what went down, other than the two participants. Your nonsensical comparison to OJ, who was defended by a dream team of the best CRIMINAL lawyers money could buy, with Tyson, who was defended by a TAX lawyer, is laughable and indicates more naiveté. Ms. Washington had a history of making such false claims and walked away with over a million dollars. You draw your conclusions and I'll draw mine.
I mean, he looked fast, and was putting combinations together well, and was moving his head well etc. But mentally he had a melt-down.
I know, it's silly. People are still clinging to a notion that Tyson's ranking and ability to beat the top HWs (in 2002) was genuine.