Who will rank higher in the ATG list, Joe Calzaghe or Emmanuel Pacquiao?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC!, May 27, 2015.


  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,452
    15,715
    Jul 19, 2004
     
  2. RazorbackBoxing

    RazorbackBoxing Active Member Full Member

    564
    0
    Apr 15, 2015
    exactly this
     
  3. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,275
    Dec 1, 2007
    Pacquiao was a belt holder in 8 divisions. Not World Champion. World Champion suggests he was unified, and the best of the division. I don't think Pac would have beat Juan Guzman. Might not have beaten Raheem, or Nate Campbell when he was hot.

    Pacquiao did face the much stiffer opposition between the two, and it isn't even close. Calzaghe has Hopkins, and Kessler. Pac has Barrera, Morales, Cotto, etc.

    Calzaghes resume is viewed as extremely soft, and his best win is highly controversial. He was awarded a majority decision despite landing no more than 50 punches.
     
  4. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,896
    3,046
    Dec 11, 2009
    There is not arguement Barry.
    How can a fighter who has been KOd and beaten on several occasions compare to a fabulous 46-0, clear ruler of a division with 24 world title victories be compared. They cant
     
  5. RazorbackBoxing

    RazorbackBoxing Active Member Full Member

    564
    0
    Apr 15, 2015
    It will ruffle some feathers but bhop deserved the nod for sure. As you say calzaghe landed nothing, what he did land were sloppy pitty-patty slaps and he got dropped.

    I think you are under selling pac
     
  6. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,896
    3,046
    Dec 11, 2009
    :patsch Thats why Hopkins was hanging on, looking for time out and backing off :patsch.
     
  7. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,896
    3,046
    Dec 11, 2009
    48 more punches than his opponent who he outlanded in every round
     
  8. RazorbackBoxing

    RazorbackBoxing Active Member Full Member

    564
    0
    Apr 15, 2015
    He was backing late because he was 43 and fighting out of his natural weight class , plus absorbed at least one low-blow.

    Pac had 10x joe's resume before he made it to lightweight
     
  9. RazorbackBoxing

    RazorbackBoxing Active Member Full Member

    564
    0
    Apr 15, 2015
    Compubox isnt always right as this ridiculous notion proves.
     
  10. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,085
    Feb 16, 2013
    Is this a real question MVC or are you still annoying the Pacquiao fans? :lol:
     
  11. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    Calzaghe ain't even on the list.
     
  12. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    Correct, Zaggers was so good he has a list unto his own. Then all the other lesser fighters in history are on a separate list. :happy
     
  13. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,085
    Feb 16, 2013
    Pacquiao's opponents read like a Who's Who of boxing...

    Calzaghe's reads like a Who's that?

    As much as I liked Joe, it is a ridiculous question, it is not even close.
     
  14. Barry Smith

    Barry Smith Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,570
    23
    Aug 13, 2012
    In a 46 fight career, Calzaghe basically has 2 wins against top level fighters and one of those was a highly debatable SD, in which he got dropped, against a 43 year-old that he was a huge favorite to beat.
     
  15. klimting

    klimting ???? Full Member

    1,629
    19
    Nov 23, 2008
    No comparison, Pacquiao will always light up the history books with his incredible jump through the weight divisions in recent times.

    Calzaghe will be remembered as a great 168lber, but far too many duff or unknown opponents on his resume in the grand scheme of things. And his best opponents (or names rather) came far too late in his career.