5 fights you'd like to see in the Heavyweight division and why?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, May 28, 2015.


  1. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    LIst 5 fights you'd like to see in the Heavyweight division. Only rule is you can only pick a fighter once (for example, if you have Vlad v Wilder, you cannot also have Vlad v Fury).
     
  2. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    Wlad v Povetkin
    Fury v Wilder
    Pulev v Jennings
    Joshua v Thompson
    Takam v Stiverne
     
  3. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014
    Wlad-wilder
    Povetkin-Joshua
    Fury-Ortiz
    Briggs-hughie fury
    Mansour- stiverne
     
  4. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    Here are my five:

    Wladimir Klitschko v Shannon Briggs


    :rant:rant:rant Let's go champ! I'd like to see Briggs get his butt handed to him and have hos trolling ended in brutal fashion. Would make a funny circus, stay-busy fight for Vlad, while some of the below attempt to prove worth contendership.


    Tyson Fury v Deontay Wilder

    Would be an entertaining build up, a glass shattering basically guaranteed, and the winner would be top contender for Vlad .

    Alexander Povetkin v Kurbat Puelv


    The two highest rated fighters in the division who have already lost to Vlad, should fight to put in their claim for a rematch.

    Bryant Jennings v Tony Thompson

    Bryant Jennings and Tony Thompson collide for title of top US heavyweight.


    Anthony Joshua v Dillian Whyte

    Big UK event between two unbeaten fighters, who don't like each other with history- Whyte beat AJ in the amateurs
     
  5. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    Joshua - Price too
     
  6. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    You may get your wish on Sept 12th...
     
  7. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    :happy
     
  8. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    247,059
    243,614
    Nov 23, 2013
    Povetkin s Pulev
    Wilder Vs Wach
    Joshua Vs.Stiverne
    Arreola Vs Ruiz
    Mansour Vs Browne
     
  9. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    Klitschko-Klitschko
    Fury-Haye
    Fury-Wilder
    Fury-Fury
    Wilder-Klitschko
     
  10. TSoprano

    TSoprano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,968
    903
    Sep 26, 2014
    Wladimir-Povetkin
    Wladimir-Briggs
    Fury-Wilder
    Price-Arreola
    Haye-Vitali
     
  11. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    Read the OP and try again.
     
  12. Boxing Prospect

    Boxing Prospect Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,250
    5,729
    May 10, 2012
    Wilder Vs Povetkin
    Fury Vs Klitschko
    Zhang Junlong Vs Taishan Dong "Battle of China"
    Anthony Joshua Vs Joseph Parker
    Hughie Fury Vs Andry Ruiz Jr
     
  13. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    :nono The rules are you can only use one fighter per fight. Pretend they all take place on the same night so you need to pick 10 different fighters.
     
  14. Ducklerr

    Ducklerr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,815
    1,908
    Apr 1, 2015
    If they were all to take place on the same night I would choose AJ to go through this list...

    Joshua - Price
    Joshua - Thompson
    Joshua - Stiverne
    Joshua - Glazkov
    Joshua - Perez
    Joshua - Takam
    Joshua - Pulev
    Joshua - Wilder
    Joshua - Fury
    Joshua - Povetkin
    Joshua - Wlad
    Joshua - Joshua

    Easy work for AJ, only one with a chance against him is AJ :nod
     
  15. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    **** your stupid rules. Those are the five fights I want to see. Besides, you didn't put "official" in the title so your thread doesn't mean ****. :bart