Who will rank higher in the ATG list, Joe Calzaghe or Emmanuel Pacquiao?

Calzaghe was rubbish.

 

Dont worry Beouche, I realised what the thread was about and was just having a bit of fun myself.
To really think someone would compare the mighty 46-0 to a fighter who has been defeated a few times atsch

 

This is why nobody takes you serious. Funny little joker Herol / Eric :nut

 

What high standards you have patsch

 

Can you imagine a PED pumped Calzaghe being knocked out for FIVE MINUTES againt a shot 40 year old, Bailey?

Hell can you even imagine just a PED pumped Zaggers?! :scaredas:

We would be looking in the region of 1000 punches a round :deal

 

Pac obviously from big Calz fan

 

People just don't seem able to separate their personal favourites from objective reality. :-(

 

quite easily - 40 year old Hopkins might well have kept joe down. 43 year old hops was no longer up to it. Wow Calturds are so easy to destroy themselves.


no welsh ref to save him when bhop "slips" in America either.

 

I see you wrote that line on its own as a reply, failing to even attempt to qualify it

thanks for failing again, yet more proof why you are called failey without anyone needing to point it out.

 

Calzaghe was a disgraceful fighter, even though I think he beats Froch if they had fought 8 years ago.

 

No debate at all, Pacquiao easily. Even the most biased Brit surely couldn't make a case for this!

 

typical fac fan in denial ... stopped reading right there ... this is why yelp consider excusequiao fans as the worst in all sports

 

Says the person who needed to edit this most basic a reply nearly two hours later atsch

 

Yes, it was truly a disgrace how much greater he was than everyone else in his era. The rest of boxing was put to shame :nod

 

your kind of opinion is the disgrace he in inferring too, thanks for providing an example.

calturds destroy themselves yet again.