Calzaghe aside- who is the GOAT at 168?

Yeah quite a few VCash also lost on wrongfully calling Ottke's cut via headbutt when it was actually Tate's right hand. Not only was Tate robbed of a TKO victory, so was the VCash.

 

Come on Sven, how you going to claim it was Tate's headbutt that caused the cut when the fight video clearly shows Ottke's cut caused by a clean right hand:-

41:15 of the video you see the right hand by Tate that caused the cut

[yt]UquWf_I72bo[/yt]

Slow motion replay 51:35

Fight was stopped because of Ottke's cut, thus the fight should have been ruled a TKO victory for Thomas Tate who caused the cut with a legit punch.

 

Atm I have it:

Jones jr
Toney
Calzaghe
Eubank
Benn

Never bothered ranking past 5.

Once Froch and Ward retire they'll be in there.

 

I wouldnt take Lufc too seriously. I think he says a bit for reaction. He once wrote how he felt Reid beat Calzaghe and then something like 3 pages full pages later and when watching the fight then wrote that he had watched again and felt Calzaghe was a clear winner.
He wrote another time that he felt Calzaghe beat Hopkins, then argued Hopkins should be above Hopkins because he had changed his mind and then later wrote that he had changed it back and felt Calzaghe won.
You get idea.
He wouldnt be able to make a sensible arguement for anyone having a better SMW resume than Calzaghe but will try and post for the sake of it

 

Its possible. there are many on here

 

irrelevant to you, in your opinion.

do not try and force out the opinions of others when you don't agree with them, this is a freespeaking forum.

 

Please answer Herol / Eric

 

Kovalev, Stevenson, Ward, Froch



Arguably the 2 biggest names at LHW and SMW respectively.

So what do they all have in common?

Well if you look at the top 3 wins for all, one of their best wins has been a faded opponent that Calzaghe beat when prime, yet ESB fanboys rate those as top wins and then say Calzaghe didnt beat anyone . The ESB self pwnage is unbelievable

 

you appear to be asking me to answer after you have quoted the answer I gave you, you odd man.

who is eric? this is one you HAVENT answered....though I don't mind you stringing out your failue to answer for a while. the pain is good to watch.

 

no ones saying kovalevs win over bhop is worth much.

no ones saying beatng injured Kessler wasn't a good win for calzaghe

So your points are worthless, since you are just inventing mistakes of others so that you can pretend to laud over their fictional mistakes.
more importantly - why do you do this? can you not just raise points to counter real posts by real people.