Khan: " Brook brings nothing to the table!"

can you elaborate, please?

 

If Brook brings nothing, then Khan has to bring even less. Being that there is no quantity or quality less than nothing, I named something that would be extremely negative to bring to the dinner table.

Are you mentally challenged or just lacking at English that I needed to explain that to you?

 

So trying to get the Mayweather fight = ducking Brook.

Yeah, makes sense.

Brook brings nothing to the table compared to Khan, Brook is still an unknown outside of Britain.

 

Everything will be completely justified on Khan's end IF he gets the Mayweather fight.

If he does not, then all of this negative discussion directed at him is entirely warranted and then some.

 

It makes sense to Khan fans.

They have cried from mountain tops for years that Bradley ducked Khan in order to face Manny Pacquiao at WW.

 

This is another fight that has been brewing for many years. This is the perfect time for it, at WW, in England, for Brook's title. Aside from a Floyd fight, this would likely be the most lucrative for Amir as well. Too bad Khan is trying desperately to avoid taking on any legit contender/puncher while hoping to cash out against Mayweather. That part is clear as day. Too bad because I think he lost his opportunity after that performance against Algieri.

 

Khan brings nothing to the table in a Pac or Mayweather fight - doesn't stop him blabbering pish about it at any given opportunity.

Total nonsense anyway - Brook v Khan would fill Wembley again. It'd be massive on a domestic level.

 

Khan-floyd is running scared (khans claim to deserve a shot at him,beating Alexander algieri collazo Diaz who knocked him senseless)
Khan-brook has nothing to bring to the table
Khans greatest win being the victory over the man brook beat for the title he wants to bring to the table.
Farce

 

Right now Brook brings far more to the table than the twice the KTFO chicken dancing Khan.

 

Enough of this 'if he gets the Floyd fight, avoiding Brook is justified'. Khan has already stated he has no interest in fighting Brook even if the Floyd fight falls through, his ducking is shameful.

 

Brooks brings a whole lot more than Khan's recent opponents, that's for sure. This is the classic "British boxer doesn't want to lose to another British" situation. They prefer to lose to a big American fighter so they can still pretend to be the best British in their divison. Calzaghe vacated his WBC belt and fought Hopkins instead of Froch. Problem with Khan is though he will probably fail to land a Mayweather fight and he will have to fight another B grade instead of Brook which will look even more pathetic than his Algieri situation.

 

Amir is going for the Mayweather fight which he obviously should do and fair enough. The problem is him saying he wouldn't fight Brook even if he doesn't get the Floyd fight as there are other bigger fights out there for him. The biggest fight is Brook and Amir knows that if he loses he is done and that scares him senseless

 

Khan knows he'll get beat simple as that.

 

How can anyone really like amir khan ?

 

All I can say is that IF Khan arranged to fight Brook instead of Algieri and won confidently, he would get the winner of May-Pac fight, that is Floyd Mayweather and earned a very good amount of money. I mean, in this case Floyd fight would be guaranteed for him. Yet he fights Algieri and fails to win impressively.

I don't like to make those claims, but here it is clear, that Kell Brook fight made a lot of sense to Khan (money+legacy+Mayweather fight). He picks Algieri and this is a perfect example of what "ducking" is. Khan is obviously ducking Brook.