Pacquaio is doing way bigger numbers in ppv now then he was doing in ppvs from 2005-2008.... so ur logic is flawed bigtime.....
Compare the ratings.... it was obvious more people tuned in to watch pac/jmm then barerra/pac... Barerra was shot and worn out by the time Pac fought him....JMM was the true ducked prime fighter Pac fought, and arguably lost 3 out of 4 to as well...
Exactly, give me old, blown up and lower stamina Pac over the young, fast and strong Pac that never tired. I'd watch the old Manny over the young Manny any day of the week.
IMO Pacquiao's top 6 performances ranked 1. Barrera I 2. Marquez II 3. Marquez I 4. Ledwaba 5. Cotoo 6. Morales I
Morales 1 he lost, jmm 2 he lost, jmm 1 he lost, 1) Morales 2 2)De la hoya 3)Cotto 4.)Hatton 5.)Barerra 1 6.) David Diaz These are mine..^^^^
I don't give Pacquiao credit for beating shot punching bags. Morales 2 was shot. DLH was shot. Diaz was a paper champ. Pacquiao fought two close fights with Marquez at his peak. That's tough to do. Morales was in incredible fighter in the first fight. Losing a close decision to him is an accomplishment.
Why was morales shot in the second fight?? Because he lost to a slick stylist in Zahir raheem? Going by that logic i definately know you thought Barerra was shot now:deal And de la hoya wasnt shot, he was drained...big difference... no one including yourself really though pac had a chance against oscar even at a weight he hadnt fought in 7 years...your logic would suggest that.. David diaz was a good strong bigger lw and put up a better performance then ur beloved "unknown" Ledwaba.. And jmm... he arguably lost 3 out of 4 fight to, so i dont see how struggling against jmm in the rematch where he won by 1 point be a great perfoemance... hes never looked good against jmm, ever..