Miguel Angel Cotto vs. Daniel Geale RBR

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Jun 6, 2015.

  1. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    17,291
    Geale quite. Pretty sorry that he just showed up just for a check.
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    396,089
    Likes Received:
    78,340
    Ah. I just answered my own question with a quick Google.

    Bitch move, no doubt - but we're talking about 3lbs. Geale is usually a pound or two under the limit anyway, isn't he? Not really a big deal, or a big difference maker.

    I wouldn't compare it to Ward vs. Dawson, for instance. That's a guy seven pounds south of where he was comfortable for several years. Here we're talking what - a one, two pound variance from what Geale usually weighs in?

    ...and, it was agreed upon early in the negotiations and Geale had as much time as could be asked for to make that weight, just a pound or so off from his usual?

    Meh.

    Not something to detract from the victory over, IMO.
     
  3. Hercegovac

    Hercegovac Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2010
    Messages:
    7,583
    Likes Received:
    98
    Cotto looked great, him vs Canelo will be a great fight
     
  4. glovesofcrimson

    glovesofcrimson Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2013
    Messages:
    4,018
    Likes Received:
    6
    Tainted win but nobody can say Miguel didn't look impressive, we'll have to gauge how detrimental it was for Geale to cut those extra pounds. He was clearly nowhere near Maravilla's handicapped condition, I guess you offset Cotto's smaller frame against the limit he imposed on Geale so it's not really a viable plaudit you can give him.
     
  5. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Messages:
    53,088
    Likes Received:
    6,684
    You knew it was at 157 back when it was signed. You picked Geale to win. You were very wrong.
     
  6. capt1

    capt1 Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2015
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    3
    More than Roach, matchmaking and catch weights have helped Cotto look so dominant.
     
  7. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    Messages:
    10,126
    Likes Received:
    57
    Geale didn't weigh 182. 174-175 more likely. Street clothes can weigh quite a bit.

    And despite whatever Cotto says, he was weighing in unofficially at 159 way back in his days at 140. He was 169 at the 30-day weigh in. He's ALWAYS been a middleweight.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    396,089
    Likes Received:
    78,340
    Honestly no. :conf

    Also been a bit preoccupied, but even under normal circumstances I don't know that drama around the build-up to Cotto vs. Geale would ever have piqued my interest much.

    I don't care about the drama. I care what happens inside the ring. What just happened inside the ring is Cotto destroyed Geale - and to my eyes it didn't seem to be a horribly drained Geale. It was a Geale that was overwhelmed like a deer in the headlights, same as he was against Golovkin.

    I don't think you can really call a one pound variance from Geale's usual weight a major factor here, and speaking as someone that was barely aware of any weight issues heading in, this just didn't have the look of a drained fighter getting beaten up. It was a fighter getting beaten up.
     
  9. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Messages:
    60,097
    Likes Received:
    5,569
    God he was sensational tonight
     
  10. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    28,071
    Likes Received:
    17,291
    The reason I don't harp to much about catchweight is both party agreed to it. If you can't make the weight or you think it will affect your performance then don't sign. If you sign then make the catchweight and don't use it as an excuse.
     
  11. Hotsauce

    Hotsauce Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Messages:
    10,820
    Likes Received:
    26
    Cotto taking a vacation
     
  12. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2013
    Messages:
    36,270
    Likes Received:
    33,084
    It was a good finish and it was a good win but the catchweight does take the shine off it for me.
     
  13. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    49,370
    Likes Received:
    15,340
    It will remain a talking point, mostly to those who are agenda-driven, but as a legitimate one, too. By some, it will be talked about in the exact same league as Ward-Dawson, but in both that case and this one, I don't think the outcome was affected by the agreed upon weight. All the more reason I personally find it disappointing that Cotto didn't just beat Geale at 160, much in the same way I'm disappointed Ward didn't just outclass Dawson at 175.
     
  14. JohnnyDrama99

    JohnnyDrama99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    7,398
    Likes Received:
    903
    Cotto looked great. He was solid all the way around the board. He was sharp,composed and powerful. Geale was out of his league.
     
  15. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2010
    Messages:
    25,988
    Likes Received:
    19,869
    Canelo will smoke Cotto. Geale quit. Cotto stands no chance against GGG, and he knows it.