Miguel Angel Cotto vs. Daniel Geale RBR

Cotto was destroying him the entire night, it was only a matter of time before Geale got KO'd headbutt or not.

 

Quit doing this to yourself man, you wanna talk about the catch weight, you an talk about that all day without peep from me.,,but PED's?? That's a ridiculously uphill battle you got there, you can't even find boxer who has been guilty of cheating in boxing from the island at all whatsoever, let alone Cotto who has been cheated and has never said no to any kind of testing, you'll find nothing but torment down this road, believe..

 

I'm with you, it's getting ridiculous. I used to look forward to his post.

 

Fixed it

 

You have the shortest memory of all...

You picked Geale with supreme confidence ever since it was signed!

Less than 30 mins after he loses you're complaining about how Cotto is obviously on PED's... Some of us have been trying to educate others since it became a hot topic in 2009 but most of you didn't want to bother listening or doing your own research. So you're talking to a brick wall, I've come to notice. And mayyyyybe you've been a hypocrite on the issue, bruh. Just maybe. I don't memorize posters' names but if I had to make a bet with you, I know which way I'd lean.

------------------

This fight needs a nickname or abbreviation. I think we will have to forever refer to this fight as TKTFO4. Because it's ruining at least one persons' life.

 

Watch the replay, butt was there, but unintentional. That left hook though, that was definitely intentional.

 

Aw man you didn't like the head butt either?? I thought it was a nice touch, lol

 

I wish the admins would just give 48 hour bans to people like CST80... it'd make the site better after fights and you get this conspiracy theory bull**** every time.

Trout's a pretty good boxer, he arguably beat Canelo and lost to another elite fighter in Lara. Trout had a style that beats Canelo.. Geale doesn't.

 

OK man but you still picked Geale to win big knowing he'd be most likely drained. To not give Cotto any credit at all strikes me as utterly bitter. But whatever.

 

I managed to refrain from typing that one myself

 

CST80 picked Geale to win with supreme confidence.

He is proven very badly to be wrong in said prediction.

He immediately says "no credit can be given" and "he's on PED's!!" and "wahhhh, why aren't more people saying the stupid sh!t I'm saying right now." How childish and hypocritical. You now have no credibility on anything my man. One swift bump of this RBR and everyone can see the jacka$$ you've become... or perhaps always were but managed to conceal you're just an ALT scrub of one of these fanboys we've been ignoring for years.

 

Vegas and people with respectable knowledge knew exactly who was going to win.

I said Cotto was the underdog on this forum because he was. More people thought Geale would win. Which should be no surprise. People think with their hearts and not their heads. They see what they want to see.

 

Just so everyone knows, CST80 also picked Daniel Geale to defeat Gennady Golovkin last year.

I would not dare fabricate and make that up, either.

So maybe he thinks Geale is much better than even those who have been praising Geale on this site for years (uhhh, me!) think.

CST80 is a big ol' bitter fanboy, nothing more at the moment. Embarrassing yourself. And I've heard people say they thought you were a good poster?! Ha... Almost as funny as your bold and emphasized pick for this fight and then reaction to the outcome.